Therefore, this court cannot direct that the name of the biological father be deleted from the entire records,” the judges said. The petition said that the woman gave birth to the child out of wedlock in November 2013. She never gave the name of the child’s father to the BMC, and was unaware who disclosed that information to the authorities at the time of filling forms, she said. The father’s name should be removed from the child’s birth certificate as well as from the corporation’s records, she demanded. The BMC rejected her application, saying that an amendment can be carried out only if any entry in the birth certificate or records is erroneous. At the time of the birth of the child, the petitioner had willingly disclosed the name and occupation of the biological father, the BMC claimed. The child’s biological father — who was summoned by the court — stated that he had no objection to his name being removed. The bench also relied on the 2015 landmark judgement of the Supreme Court which stated that single mothers cannot be compelled to disclose the name of their child’s biological father in the birth certificate.
- Advertisement -
Show
comments
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -