Sunday, June 11, 2023
HomeEditorialCBI vs CBI: The Never-ending saga — Part I

CBI vs CBI: The Never-ending saga — Part I

- Advertisement -

There is no full stop to the ongoing CBI chaos as India’s premier investigating agency has sent both the Director and Special Director on a leave till the time the probe against them for corruption charges are completed. Both of them have been alleging each other of corruption, FIRs were filed, and in an unprecedented move, the CBI had raided its own headquarters.

The Supreme Court observed during the hearing on Friday that the CVC report is “very uncomplimentary” on some charges against Verma and said that a further probe was needed on some aspects. The apex court said that Verma should file his response in a sealed cover by Monday and the court will take up the matter on Tuesday. The court turned down Special CBI Director Rakesh Asthana’s request that the CVC report should be provided to him as well.

It is to be noted that the CBI Chief Alok Verma and the second-in-command Special Director Rakesh Asthana both come from a very commendable and potent career background. While Asthana is one of the most successful officials in the CBI’s history in terms of numbers of cases probed, probes completed, charge sheets filed, and the accused brought to justice, Director Verma also possess some commendable professional history in terms of the position held and the kind of achievements he made as the police chief of different UTs and the reforms he made to boost the morale of the forces.

The central government very rightly came with the argument that both of them have accused each other of corruption and for a fair probe, it was necessary that both of them are out of the official powers to ensure that the probe against them is free and fair. The government also informed in a press conference through the Finance Minister that it was the CVC which decided as per the law that both of them should be sent on a leave till the time the probe against them is completed as a measure for the time being. In other words, both of them were ousted from the office technically for the time being but practically were sacked. Now, there are questions being raised on the whole issue and with the role of the CVC. Nageshwar Rao has been appointed as the acting Director of the CBI until the time the probe is completed or the new Chief is elected as per the rules. The point to be noted is that the main argument put forward by the government and the CVC was that since both the number one and number two of CBI were accused of corruption, so both should not be holding any position in the CBI while the agency probes into the charges. But at the same time, the CVC and the government appointed Rao, as the acting Chief. Against Rao there are many charges of corruption like acting on behalf of the accused and cases of disproportionate assets which were going on and were being probed by the CBI itself under the supervision of Verma who himself had recommended that Rao should be removed from the agency.

There are many corruption allegations against him and he is known for shielding the corrupt governments. As per the story about the newly instated working Chief of the CBI as exposed in portal, the Hindustan Tele Printers Limited or HTL was started as a Public Sector Unit (PSU) of the Central Government, on December 14, 1960, at Guindy. It was intended to manufacture Teleprinters, but at the initial stage, it assembled the parts of teleprinters imported from the Italian Company Olivetti. Another PSU, Hindustan Machine Tools Limited (HMT), manufactured many of the machines required for the Hindustan Teleprinters. Hindustan Teleprinters Ltd. continued as an active supplier to P&T Department. But the economic liberalisation turned out to be a bane for this PSU, as it failed to understand the sea change in technology. The introduction of mobile services was the final nail in the coffin of HTL. It turned into a loss-making unit. When the central government wanted to commence a PSU in Chennai, TN government was liberal in allotting prime land in Chennai keeping in mind the employment it would generate. The land was allotted in 1965 and the condition for allotment was specific. The land so allotted should never be used for anything other than the purpose it has been allotted. After HTL became a sick unit, its debts started mounting. HTL owed money to banks, employees, state government by way of sales tax, etc. The banks, to which HTL owed money, formed a consortium headed by SBI. In 2001, the Department of Disinvestment decided to sell 74 per cent shares of HTL and Himachal Futuristic Communication Limited (HFCL) emerged as the successful bidder. Deepak Malhotra, Mahendra Nahata and Vinay Maloo incorporated HFCL in the year 1987.

HFCL commenced its operations by implementing a small Rs 1.68 crore project for manufacture of analogue subscriber carrier systems. Subsequently, HFCL stunned the market by forming a partnership with Israel based Bezeq and managed to win 9 of the 20 telecom circles outbidding AT&T – Birla, Reliance-Ninex, BPL-US West and Tata-Bell Canada. When HFCL’s stocks were running high, it got itself entangled in a scam with its godfather the then Telecommunications Minister Sukhram being booked by CBI. Subsequently, HFCL got embroiled in the 2G scam too.

HFCL Principal Promoter Mahendra Nahata was also accused of making frequent visits to the residence of Ranjit Sinha in spite of being involved in the 2G scam.

The consortium of banks headed by the SBI decided to auction 11.021 acres of the land belonging to HTL. The Bengaluru based RMZ Millenia, a realty firm, emerged as the successful bidder and bid Rs 298 crores for the 11.021 acres of land.

RMZ also deposited Rs 20 crores in an Escrow account towards the purchase of this land. An agreement to this effect was signed between the State Bank of India (Escrow Agent), HTL Limited the property owner and RMZ Millenia, the purchaser on March 30, 2007. But the government of Tamil Nadu was reluctant to grant a No Objection Certificate (NOC) and was litigating up to the Supreme Court. The undue delay resulted in the successful bidder RMZ Millenia pulling out of the deal. On April 16, 2012, the government of Tamil Nadu finally issued a NOC for the sale of land belonging to HTL in G.O. Ms No. 18, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Department. One of the mandatory conditions for issuance of NOC is that “out of the net sale proceeds, the company (HTL Limited) shall remit after deducting its liabilities, an amount equivalent to 10 per cent of such surplus to government”.

But, this G.O itself was the results of a criminal conspiracy say sources. The decision to issue NOC to HTL was taken in a cabinet meeting of TN cabinet headed by Jayalalitha. In the meet, it was decided to relax the condition on the sale deed.


(This is the first part of the Editorial and the latter part will continue on Sunday.)


(Any suggestions, comments or dispute with regards to this article send us on

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Vaidehi Taman
Vaidehi Taman
Vaidehi Taman an Accredited Journalist from Maharashtra is bestowed with three Honourary Doctorate in Journalism. Vaidehi has been an active journalist for the past 21 years, and is also the founding editor of an English daily tabloid – Afternoon Voice, a Marathi web portal – Mumbai Manoos, and The Democracy digital video news portal is her brain child. Vaidehi has three books in her name, "Sikhism vs Sickism", "Life Beyond Complications" and "Vedanti". She is an EC Council Certified Ethical Hacker, OSCP offensive securities, Certified Security Analyst and Licensed Penetration Tester that caters to her freelance jobs.
- Advertisement -


Must Read

- Advertisement -

Related News