Home Blog Page 4166

Ban on women entry into Haji Ali Dargah’s sanctum sanctorum to stay for now

Hazi“This is an era of intolerance”, the Bombay High Court observed while indicating that it will not decide on religious matters like the ban on entry of women in the sanctum-sanctorum of the iconic Haji Ali Dargah.

A division bench of Justices V M Kanade and Revati Mohite Dere was hearing a petition challenging the rule imposed by the Haji Ali Dargah trust which bars entry of women in the ‘sanctum sanctorum’ of the Dargah which houses the tomb of the 15th century Sufi saint Haji Ali.

“Today the atmosphere is such that everything is taken in another way. This is an era of intolerance. When it comes to religious matters people become very sensitive,” Justice Kanade said.

The court urged the parties involved to try resolving the issue outside of court.

“Earlier in a similar matter where the Parsi Panchayat had banned entry of Parsi women who married out of their caste inside their Fire Temple we (court) did not take any decision and asked them to go for an out of court settlement. The aggrieved women then approached the Supreme Court and got some relief,” the bench said.

The court has now posted the petition for further hearing on December 15.

Earlier, the trustees of the Haji Ali Dargah had told the court that entry of women in close proximity to the grave of a male Muslim saint is considered as a grievous sin in Islam.

The trust told the court last month that a meeting had been convened after the HC asked the trust to reconsider its decision and it had been again unanimously decided by the trustees not to allow women in the sanctum sanctorum.

The trust argued that the bar on entry is meant to protect women from “uncomfortable situations” and is restricted only to the sanctum sanctorum.

The petitioners, however, claim that gender justice is inherent in Quran and the norm at the Dargah contravenes the Hadiths, which say that women are not prohibited from visiting tombs.

The restriction emanates from “a very conservative and extremist Salafi ideology” and in future “there may be an order banning the entry of women in the Dargah complex and banning the non-Muslims wholly,” the petition argued.

Raju Moray, the petitioners’ lawyer, contended that at other Dargahs or shrines women are not banned. Women can enter the sanctum sanctorum at the historic Makhdoom Shah Dargah in suburban Mahim, he noted.

Bal Thackeray’s memorial to be built at Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow: Fadnavis  

DevLate Shiv Sena Chief Bal Thackeray’s memorial will come up at Mayor’s bungalow, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said on Tuesday.

While announcing the decision, Fadnavis said, “Whole Maharashtra feels a memorial of Bala Saheb should be built.”

Addressing a joint press conference with Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray, the Maharashtra CM said that the state government has selected Mayor Bungalow as spot to build Bala Saheb’s memorial. A foundation will also be set up and will be headed by Uddhav Thackeray.

Reacting to the proposed memorial, Uddhav said, “It will be great that memorials of two Hindu ‘Hriday Samrats’ Veer Savarkar and now Bala Saheb will be close to each other.”

The Sena supremo passed away at a city hospital in November 2012. After the BJP-led government came to power, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis set up a committee headed by Chief Secretary Swadheen Kshatriya to choose a site for the memorial.

Reports say that Sena had earlier asked the state government to locate the proposed memorial of its founder – the late Bal Thackeray, near the Mayor’s bungalow in Shivaji Park area, which has a historical connection with the party.

Driver came up to save Salman 13 yrs after mishap: Prosecution

Salman (6)The prosecution in the 2002 hit-and-run case involving Salman Khan refuted in the Bombay High Court the Bollywood actor’s defence that his driver Ashok Singh was driving the car and pointed out that this claim was made only towards the end of the trial.

Prosecutor Sandeep Shinde also told the court that the singer Kamaal Khan, who was riding in Salman’s car at the time, was not examined by the prosecution during the trial because he had become untraceable.

The prosecution would file a reply to the actor’s application that Kamaal Khan be examined in a day or two, Shinde told Justice A R Joshi who is hearing Salman’s appeal against his conviction and five-year sentence.

“Kamaal is a British national. He has appeared before a magistrate who conducted the trial earlier and sought permission to go abroad, which was granted….And he vanished. When the trial was transferred to the sessions court, we could not locate his whereabouts,” said the prosecutor.

Salman’s application says that Kamaal Khan was “the best eye witness” available to the prosecution who can throw the light on who was driving the car and how the mishap occurred.

“Ashok Singh (the actor’s family driver) appeared before the sessions court for the first time at the fag end of trial, 13 years after the mishap, with a view to saving his master Salman,” said Shinde, starting his arguments.

The sessions court in May this year convicted Salman for ramming his car into a Bandra shop, killing one person and injuring four others, on September 28, 2002.

“No person can keep a driver in employment for such a long time, for 13 years, who has brought a bad name to him,” said Shinde.

The defence should have made the claim that there were in fact four people in the car (including Ashok Singh) at the start of the trial and not at the fag end, he added.

According to the police, the car had three occupants: Salman in driver’s seat, his police bodyguard Ravindra Patil who passed away during the trial in 2007, and Kamaal Khan.

Post Chikki row, new policy on item purchase in place: Government

In view of allegations that sub-standard ‘chikki’ was supplied to government schools in Maharashtra, the state told the Bombay High Court that a new policy has been formed which sets out procedures to be followed before purchasing such items.

Advocate General Shrihari Aney informed a division bench of justices V M Kanade and Revati Mohite Dere that a government resolution dated October 30 has been issued setting up a policy ‘Manual of Office Procedure for Purchase of Stores by Government Department’.

“Under the policy several categories have been formed setting out procedures that will have to be followed by the state departments before purchasing any items. Financial constraints have been set so as to reduce any allegation of corruption,” Aney said.

As per the policy, the process of e-tendering has been made compulsory for any and every purchase.

“If the purchase is between Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 50,000 per annum then e-tenders will have to be issued. If the purchase is between Rs. three lakh to Rs. one crore then quotations will have to be called before issuing tenders,” Aney said.

He added that before any purchase is made prior approval of the state government is a must.

“Proposals for any purchase will have to be submitted before February 15 every year and the same will have be sanctioned by the government before March 15. No sanctions will be given after March 15,” the advocate general said.

The HC was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Sandeep Ahire and others seeking an inquiry by a retired High Court judge into the alleged Rs 206 crore ‘chikki scam’, for which Women and Child Development Minister Pankaja Munde had come under fire.

The court today sought to know if any inquiry was set up by the government in the alleged ‘chikki scam’ to which Aney said no inquiry as such was ordered but the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration had conducted checks on the quality of the ‘chikki’ and found it to be fine.

The court has now posted the petition for hearing on December 10.

PM should tour drought-hit regions of Maha: Congress

Opposition Congress demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself should visit the drought-affected districts of Maharashtra, alleging that the relief measures were ineffective.

Leader of opposition in the Assembly Radhakrishna Vikhe Patil said a Central team’s tour of the drought-affected districts from Wednesday would not serve any purpose.

“Three Central teams have visited the state earlier and nothing has been done for the state which has seen suicides of nearly 3,000 farmers this year,” the Congress leader said.

“Prime Minister is done with the Bihar polls and the UK tour. At least now he will have the time to listen to the grievances of farmers,” said Vikhe Patil.

Vikhe Patil said he had sought details from the government about how many students in the drought- affected districts had to give up the studies because of inability to pay the fees.

“Cotton production has declined this year and the government has set up only 21 procurement centres. Farmers are not bringing their produce to these centres,” he said, adding that despite the assurance to set up more procurement centres for soybean, maize and cotton, nothing happened.

The BJP-led government lacked the willpower to bring down the prices of essential commodities, Vikhe Patil alleged.

State NCP chief Sunil Tatkare said his party had asked its district units to ascertain the ground reality of relief.

Reports would be submitted to him within eight days, he said.

“Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has sent a reply to (NCP president) Sharad Pawar’s letter about the drought relief. The CM’s letter speaks about how the situation is improving after his government’s efforts. We have asked our district units to check whether the water supply by tankers has stopped and whether the youths are going to schools and colleges,” he said.

Woman cop dismissed for misbehaving with colleagues

A woman officer, who was posted on deputation at a Special Branch unit of Mumbai Police, was dismissed for levelling false allegations against her colleagues and seniors.

State Director General of Police (DGP) Pravin Dixit has dismissed Sujata Warane, who was posted on deputation at K unit of Special Branch (SB-1) here, from service on November 11, DCP (Detection) Dhananjay Kulkarni said.

The officer was designated as chief intelligence officer in SB-1 that deals with dispatch of files and applications from the branch, Kulkarni said.

“There were several complaints against the officer by her colleagues and seniors that she behaved rudely, insulted and abused them on various occasions,” the officer said.

A departmental inquiry was initiated against Warane, which found that in one such incident which took place between February 2010 and October, 2011 period, the officer had abused and insulted one of her senior officers Chandrakant Bhosale and an inspector by passing comments referring to their caste, Kulkarni said.

It was also found that Warane in her personal police diary had falsely written that she was abused by her colleagues, he said.

After the inquiry, Warane was dismissed for behaviour against the disciplined force, the DCP said.

MCOCA court adjourns Dey’s murder trial till Nov 23

A special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court adjourned the trial in the journalist J Dey murder case till November 23 after it was told by Mumbai Police that the state government has handed over all cases against underworld don Chhota Rajan to CBI.

“The case is adjourned on the ground that the government has handed over (J Dey) case to CBI. The copy (of notification) is not yet received and defence (advocate) has no objection. In view thereof (the case) is adjourned to November 23 for recording of evidence,” observed MCOCA Special Judge A L Pansare during proceedings in the case.

The court directed Mumbai Police to produce the copy of the notification at the earliest.

However, the judge sought to know if the entire trial is transferred or further investigation is transferred to CBI.

“CBI may carry out further investigation but what about the present trial,” the court asked.

“Make an application why the trial should not proceed, there should be some reason,” the judge said when Assistant Police Commissioner Sunil Deshmukh told the court that the case has been transferred to CBI.

When Deshmukh submitted that since the case has been taken over by CBI, the matter has to go to the special CBI court, judge Pansare said that CBI court notification was not required.

“No law says that CBI-investigated case has to go to CBI court,” the judge said.

Rajan was arrested at Bali airport on October 25 on the basis of an Interpol Red Corner notice after he reached there from Australia. He was deported to India on November 6.

On the eve of his deportation, the Maharashtra government had handed over all the cases against the underworld don to CBI because of its expertise in “handling transnational crimes”.

Ticket defaulters in 1st class of Mumbai locals dip in Apr-Oct

The number of Mumbai local train first class passengers, who travel ticket less or do not take tickets corresponding to the class or length of their journey, has come down significantly in the last six months, a senior Central Railway (CR) official said.

The total number of first class passengers, who were caught holding second class tickets, were over-journeying, or were ticket less, in the Mumbai suburban trains dropped from 5,584 in April to 3,304 in October this year, he said.

In the April 2015-October 2015 period, a total of 25,911 first class passengers were booked by the CR and fine of Rs. 94.43 lakh was collected from them, he said.

Of these 25,911 cases, 18,186 passengers were travelling either ticket less or without a valid ticket, while 7,725 commuters were found over-journeying.

“We were receiving many complaints about lower class ticket holders travelling in higher class compartments. Hence, we launched a ticket-checking drive,” the official said.

“We undertook ticket-checking at all the major stations, including CST, Byculla, Dadar, Kurla, Thane, Kalyan, Mulund, Bhandup, Titwala, Badlapur, etc,” he apprised.

Upon confrontation, most of the defaulters said they were forced to enter first class compartments because second class compartments were overcrowded, the official said, adding they were penalised under relevant sections of the Railway Act.

Railway activist Anees Khan said, “The menace of ticket less passengers or those not carrying valid tickets has been on a rise. It’s good that the railway officials have started paying heed to the problem. We hope that punitive action against such passengers continues in future as well.”

Historian Purandare lauds MNS chief for Balasaheb Thackeray memorial in Nashik

Noted historian Shivshahir Babasaheb Purandare has lauded Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray for announcing to set up Sena supremo late Balasaheb Thackeray’s memorial.

The memorial will be developed by Nashik Municipal Corporation (NMC), which is currently ruled by the MNS.

“Raj Thackeray is not only a politician but also a good artist. Hence, the memorial which will be built under his supervision will be a source of inspiration for not only our state but for the entire country,” Purandare said.

Purandare had accompanied Thackeray on Monday in the city during their visit to the memorial site.

Mayor Ashok Murtdak, NMC officials and MNS corporators were present.

Thackeray had earlier this year had announced to set up a memorial for Balasaheb Thackeray.

HC pulls up political parties for hoardings across Maharashtra

 

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday warned political parties of contempt action for putting up illegal hoardings, posters and banners across Maharashtra despite an undertaking given by them that they would not do so.

The court was hearing two PILs alleging that political parties, in total disregard to the rules and laws, had put up illegal hoardings and banners all over the state thereby defacing private and public properties in the towns and cities.

Justices Abhay Oka and Gautam Patel said the parties had violated their own undertakings by erecting hoardings and banners without permission of the authorities and despite notices issued to them by the court commissioners appointed to check this practice.

“It is painful to hear that despite assurances such practice continues… We will take stern action against the concerned by passing an order on November 20,” the judges said while going through the reports submitted by various commissioners appointed by the high court to stop this.

Adjourning the matter until then, the bench said it was inclined to issue contempt notices to various political parties and municipal bodies which had failed to remove illegal hoardings, banners and posters.

One petition was filed by Bhagwanji Riyani of Janhit Manch and the other by SuSwaraj Foundation.

Earlier, NCP, Congress, Shiv Sena and MNS had filed separate undertakings in affidavits to the high court assuring that their workers would not put up such illegal hoardings, posters and banners.

In response to high court orders, the political parties had even issued advertisements in local newspapers asking their party workers to refrain from putting up posters without permission of authorities.

Riyani argued today that several political parties had put up illegal hoardings and banners all over Mumbai on the occasion of Chaat puja, thereby defying the earlier orders of the high court.

He pleaded that contempt action should be taken against the parties concerned and guilty officers of municipal bodies who failed to check this illegal act.

The petitions claimed that political parties were not taking permission from the local authorities to put up hoardings and banners and thus did not pay the necessary charges.

Moreover, after erecting such illegal banners the parties did not remove them for several months thereby violating laws and rules of the local authorities, the PILs added.

In August last year, while hearing the petitions, the high court had appointed nodal agencies to check illegal hoardings all over the state and asked them to take strict action against the guilty.

The bench also ordered senior police inspectors in Mumbai and officers in-charge of police stations concerned outside the city to provide protection to the municipal team which removes such illegal posters and hoardings.

The court had ordered police protection because municipal bodies complained that workers of political parties beat up their staff whenever they moved in to remove such hoardings.