Newcomer Sooraj Pancholi said that he is grateful to his mentor superstar Salman Khan for considering him as a star and he wants to learn time management from him.
Salman is launching Sooraj with Hero, the remake of Subhash Ghai’s 1983 film of the same name. Hero directed by Nikhil Advani, which also marks the debut of Athiya Shetty, daughter of actor Suniel Shetty and will release on Friday.
“It feels good but ‘superstar’ is a big word. I am trying to be an actor first. To be a star it will take time. We can’t be a star overnight. If he (Salman) sees that (superstar) in us then it is his greatness,” said Sooraj.
“He is being very nice to us. Athiya Shetty and I have worked really very hard for this film. People usually say we are star kids so we don’t work that hard but that is not true,” he said.
“It was not obvious (for Salman to launch me) at all because he never told me that he would launch me ever. I got to know him only on the sets of Ek Tha Tiger. People think it is a family thing so he launched me,” Sooraj added.
“I was an assistant director on the sets of Ek Tha Tiger that’s where he found it that I want to be an actor. And he offered me the film and that’s how I got Hero.” Sooraj revealed when he was signed by Salman for Hero remake under his banner, he did not even tell his parents about signing the film.
“I did not even tell my parents about it for one and half year that I am going to do the film. I felt shy to tell them about it as we never discussed films,” he says.
In that one and half year period, Sooraj was training in Mumbai. The remake version of the film also features his father, actor Aditya Pancholi.
He was nervous shooting with him. “One day before I had to shoot a scene with him, I was nervous. But when I went on sets I sensed that my father was little more nervous than me because it was very emotional for him,” Sooraj said.
“May be he thought that he would over shadow or over power me because he is a good actor, much better looking than me. I think he was underplaying it that day. But he made me feel comfortable,” he said.
John Abraham, who shares a great bond with Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni, is happy with the film being made on him and thinks actor Sushant Singh Rajput will do a great job.
“M S Dhoni: The Untold Story” is an upcoming biopic directed by Neeraj Pandey. “He (Dhoni) is a friend and I am glad a film is being made on Mahi’s life. I am happy about it. I respect the vision of the director,” said John.
The 29-year-old “Detective Byomkesh Bakshy!” actor will essay the role of one of India’s most successful captain, while Kiara Advani will feature as his wife Sakshi Singh Dhoni.
“I respect the director and the actor for doing this film. I am sure Sushant will be fantastic and will do good work,” the “Madras Cafe” star said.
John, 42, is currently working on “Force 2” and is busy shooting in Budapest (Hungary) along with Sonakshi Sinha, who plays a RAW agent.
“It’s second day of the shoot. Sonakshi (Sinha) is a lovely girl… She is hard working and dedicated.”
While “Force” was helmed by Nishikant Kamat of “Drishyam” fame, Abhinay Deo will direct the sequel that is expected to hit the screens in May next year. Meanwhile, John is happy with the response his last release “Welcome Back” has got at the box office.
The movie was a sequel to the 2007 comedy “Welcome” directed by Anees Bazmee.
Actor Kunal Khemu says that his wife and actress Soha Ali Khan doesn’t interfere in the film choices that he makes.
In an interview as part of the promotions of his film, “Bhaag Johnny”, Kunal said: “She doesn’t interfere in my films. And the final decision is always our own.”
However Kunal says that they generally discuss projects with each other.
“We generally discuss projects that we’re doing. We respect each other as professionals – because we’ve been doing that before we met each other,” he said.
Kunal and Soha tied the knot in a private ceremony in January this year after several years of courtship. Their romance grew on the sets of their films, “Dhoondte Reh Jaaoge” and “99”.
Soha too intends to work post-marriage and will be seen opposite Sunny Deol in the sequel of “Ghayal”.
Kunal is returning to the big screen after a gap of two years with “Bhaag Johnny” and he says that the story of the film is its USP.
“It’s the first time that such story and screenplay technique is being showed on screen. But yet it is presented in a simple way so that audiences don’t remain confused about the film,” said Kunal.
“Bhaag Johnny” directed by Shivamm Nair also stars Zoa Morani, Mandana Karimi and Manasi Scott among others. The film is scheduled to release on September 25.
According to them the BMC’s resolution will only disturb the communal harmony of the country.
Even though the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has banned animal slaughter and sale of meat in Mumbai for four days during the Jain fasting season of Paryushan but the Jain Community is not pleased with this decision. According to them since, India is a secular country and people have right to follow religion and faith and such type of resolution will only disturb the communal harmony of the country. The Fadnavis government had already received flak for imposing beef ban in the state. The latest order comes days after the BJP ruled Mira-Bhayander municipal corporation banned the sale of meat in the area for eight days during the Jain fasting period called Paryushan. How can one person’s religious belief allow them to dictate their lifestyle choices on others?
Kunal Shah who is the co-founder of FreeCharge, said “I was born a Jain and I am ashamed of #Meatban.”
“Can assure you that Lord Mahavira never forced anyone to do what he likes/dislikes. He just inspired and people did what they wanted. Never by force and this is going to end up in a chain reaction where every minority religion will want others to respect their “sentiment”. We should never get carried away and lose our common sense.” he added further.
“I totally justify the ban on meat selling or slaughtering, not just for 8 days but I would love if this ban were carried for life. Not because I am a Jain, I justify the ban, but on a humanitarian ground,” said Sangeeta Jain, a lecturer at SNDT College.
“As a vegetarian myself, I believe that a ban, however temporary, on meat is both legally and morally wrong,” said Ramachandra Guha, Historian.
Vidhi Shah a PR executive said, “Yes. I do support the ban. As India is a democratic country and here the view of each and every citizen is heard.”
“If the government is going to ban something at least compensate the people whose livelihood you’re snatching away for that day,” said Madhuri Banerjee, book author.
“As a Citizen of India we all are bound to follow Constitution of India, which gave us the right to profess, practice and propagate respective religion provided it, doesn’t hurt the sentiments of other religions” said Mahatisagar Shaha, a Chemical Engineer.
“Considering all these facts, my stand on this matter is very clear that though Jains have every right to follow the Ahimsa in every part of life but to forcefully impose the ban on meat will ruin the fundamentals of ‘Live and Let Live’. Hence, I don’t support the forceful imposition of ban on non-veg during Paryusha Parv” he added.
Asaduddin Owaisi, MLA from AIMIM, has condemned the decision of meat ban by Maharashtra government, Owaisi said, “The state government’s decision is unjustified questioning whether it would be tolerable if during Bakra Eid only meat would be served. The government should use its power to reduce the ban and limit it to just two days so that the traders do not suffer.”
Further he said, “I challenge the Maharashtra government to ban alcohol which is a cause of greater misery.”
The BMC took the call to continue the ban which was first enforced a few years ago based on a 1964 and 1994 corporation resolution. The state government too had passed a similar resolution in 2004, where the BMC was asked to shut down slaughter houses during the Jain fasting season.
While the BMC usually restricts slaughter and sale of meat for two days during Paryushan, this year it enforced the four-day ban — 10, 13, 17 and 18 September — across Mumbai. On these days, BMC slaughter houses will be shut and sale of meat will also be prohibited. The BMC’s markets department has been asked to enforce the ban. The decision to enforce the ban was taken by BMC commissioner Ajoy Mehta.
“The ban is anti-democratic. The BMC has buckled under pressure from the BJP. The government should not take any decision to please a particular religious community and should function as per constitution,” said Sanjay Nirupam, former MP and president of Mumbai Congress unit.
The Raj Thackeray-led Maharashtra Navnirman Sena has also hit out at the BJP over the issue. MNS’s group leader Sandeep Deshpande has called the BJP as ‘Bharatiya Jain Party’ for getting the meat ban enforced.
“This is cultural terrorism. Today, they have banned the sale for four days, will they ask us to stop eating meat,” said MNS corporator Sandeep Deshpande.
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation has banned the slaughter and sale of meat in its markets for four days in Mumbai during Paryushan Parva, a Jain festival. However, the ban is not applicable on the sale of fish and eggs. The four days during which the Deonar abattoir would be shut and sale of meat will be banned are September 10, 13, 17 and 18. BJP wanted the ban to be imposed on all eight days, but civic body agreed to four days ban. Ban is only on meat and chicken. However, there is no ban on fish, sea food or eggs.
There are debates on national television and we have seen the outrage on social media also over it. It is more ridiculous that the PM is silent on this matter which seems that the government has become dictatorial. Any disagreement of public opinion will be charged with sedition. I see it as a step to end the democracy, unless large, collective voices are not raised. In this manner, we will soon be in a police state.
Opposing and favouring meat ban is mere politics from both sides. As a Mumbaikar if you ask me, then I can say meat is easily available in malls, restaurants and food joints too. It’s a matter of three days, people can buy the meat in advance and refrigerate it. If one wants to adjust then they can adjust anyhow. My concern is not those politicians who are adamant over ban and neither that who protest against the same. I am concerned about those mutton shop employees whose survival depends on this business. I hope the ‘concerned’ government will have some plans to compensate them? If they have no such plan then this ‘adamant’ decision would be making those people suffer for no reason.
Months after a controversial beef ban in Maharashtra, a move to prohibit meat for four days in Mumbai has provoked anger, with comments on social media calling it a breach of the freedom to choose. No one has realized that this is not the first time that the ban is imposed; it has been in force since 1964, when the BMC passed a resolution directing a two-day prohibition on sale of meat in deference to the demands by Jains, a powerful community which holds many stakes in business and industry in Mumbai. In 2004, the Congress-NCP government passed another resolution endorsing the two-day ban. Since then, the ban has been extended to four days across Mumbai every September. Two days are according to the 1964 BMC resolution and two on account of the state’s 2004 resolution. That time social media was not so active and also the mainstream media was limited, that’s why there was no outrage over it. The ban comes close on the heels of the Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation passing a resolution to ban sale of meat in the satellite town’s civic markets for the entire eight-day Paryushan period. Now, the Congress has done a U-turn. Having passed the state government resolution supporting the two-day ban in 2004, it is now opposing it. Anyway, political leaders are shameless and have no principles. When in power, they say one thing and once out of power, they take a U turn and oppose it. By such petty politics, they are wasting crucial time.
Maharashtra’s ruling BJP had asked for the number of days to be extended to eight, but it was rejected by the civic body. Even the BJP’s ally Shiv Sena, which has a majority in the civic body, says the ban is insupportable and alleges a political move to appease the Jain community in Mumbai, which goes to polls in 2017. On this, the Sena finds itself on the same side as the opposition Congress, which, ironically, introduced the ban. After coming to power in the state last year, the BJP-led government banned the slaughter, sale and import of beef.
Unfortunately, our country India is also moving in the direction of KSA and PRC. The decision of the BJP-led Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation (MBMC) in Mumbai to ban the slaughter and sale of meat during the Jain fasting period of Paryushan goes against the spirit of religious pluralism. Some might argue that the ban which is set to expire on September 27 is only for a short period and that non-vegetarians can easily refrain from consuming meat during this timeframe. But the question which should be asked is: How are non-vegetarians offending Jains by consuming non-vegetarian food during Paryushan? They are not forcing Jains to consume meat along with them.
Mumbai is perhaps the most cosmopolitan city in India, popular amongst tourists, home to numerous financial bigwigs, known for a diversity that no other Indian city can boast of, and not to mention one of the ‘second homes’ of Prime Minister Modi. We need to realize that, to respect each other’s beliefs we don’t need to start following or observing each other’s religious traditions and practices. An atheist does not have to attend a religious procession to make the world believe in the fact that he stands by religious freedom. He or she can choose to stay at home and yet recognize the right of theists to participate in a religious ritual. Similar attitude has to be maintained as far as the relationship between different religious communities is concerned. If someone does not consume beef or pork because of religious sensitivities then he/she should surely abstain from it but he/she cannot make others abstain from consuming such food items on the account of his/her religious beliefs.
Anyway leaving the politics, debates and outrage aside if the ban on killing any new life in slaughter house and small shops Jains feel if they can save some life even for a day then it would be a great deed. Restaurants, however, has stock and may serve meat, claimed a spokesperson of the Indian Hotels and Restaurants Association. So, people need to take it as a ‘Good Will Gesture’.
Former Mumbai Police Commissioner Rakesh Maria is not keen to lead the sensational Sheena Bora murder case.
Maria has also reportedly said that a section of the IPS officers lobby was against him.
Moreover, Maria may write a book in which he may reveal certain things.
However, there is official confirmation from the former Mumbai top cop himself.
Earlier in the day Maria had said that he was not contemplating quitting.
“I am not thinking of resigning. Reports saying so are not true,” Maria said.
There was speculation after Maria’s sudden promotion that he might resign from the post as he was apparently unhappy with being shunted out of the post of Mumbai Police Commissioner.
Maria, who was heading the high-profile Sheena Bora murder case and had interrogated the accused, was promoted as Director General of Police Home Guards.
He was replaced by Ahmed Javed, a DG-rank official, who took over as Mumbai Police Commissioner in the upgraded post.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis had cleared both the appointments before he left for Japan on Monday night.
However, after the sudden action that created quite a flutter, the Maharashtra government climbed down in the evening and said he would continue to “supervise” the probe.
The decision came under attack from opposition Congress and NCP.
Mumbai Congress had yesterday said the transfer was prompted by “undue pressure” from bosses in New Delhi and corporate houses.
As various theories floated over the reasons for Maria’s transfer, State Home Department had said the changes were made taking into account the law and order factor ahead of the Ganapati festival, dismissing suggestions that that it has some links with the ongoing investigation in the Sheena murder case.
The Mumbai police investigating the Sheena Bora murder case has asked Enforcement Directorate (ED) to look into and probe the financial transactions of the accused in this case and into the business ventures floated by the Mukerjeas–Indrani and Peter.
Sources said the agency has received a communication in this regard from police investigators and ED has deputed a team of officials to study the documents sent by them.
ED enforces two laws– Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)– and sources said the agency will study the case from these angles and decide if a parallel investigation by them is required.
“The documents sent by Mumbai police include some details on the personal finances and transactions of the involved accussed and those related to a media company floated by the Mukerjeas, Indrani and Peter, in the past,” they said.
Political acrimony over the ban on meat by civic bodies in Mumbai during the Jain fasting days grew with ruling BJP ally Shiv Sena on Wednesday vowing that it would ensure there is no such restriction.
The Sena’s stand came in the wake of Opposition Congress and NCP slamming order by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) — ruled by Sena and BJP — prohibiting meat sale for eight days from September 11 to 18 when the Jain community will observe fasting period ‘Paryushan’.
According to the order, the ban would be enforced on four days – September 10, 13, 17 and 18.
However, the NCP-controlled Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation also announced suspension of sale of meat till September 17 in view of ‘Paryushan’, though the party had yesterday joined the Congress in voicing reservation over it.
Taking a strident position on the matter, Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray said, “We will ensure there is no ban on sale of meat for the eight days.”
Interestingly, Sena is the dominant partner in BMC where it shares power with BJP.
The BJP, which has pressed for the ban, held that the decision was taken by the civic bodies and the state government has no role in it.
The NCP had on Tuesday voiced reservation over the ban order, with the party along with Congress dubbing it as a BJP ploy to polarise voters with an eye on the elections to the civic body due in early 2017.
The ward officer of A ward in Navi Mumbai said in a statement that there will be no sale of meat from today till September 17.
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education rejected an RTI plea about Maharashtra Education Minister Vinod Tawde’s marksheet and board certificate due to Tawde’s pressure, NCP alleged.
NCP spokesperson Nawab Malik claimed that the minister declared his education qualification as “BE (Electronics)” from a bogus institute called Dnayeshwar Vidyapeeth.
“It is believed that Tawde did not clear his 12th standard and hence an RTI query was made to clear doubts about his 10th and 12th standard education,” Malik alleged.
Public Information Officer and Joint Secretary Ranjana Chaskar of the Mumbai Board, in her reply to the RTI query by activist Anil Galgali, stated that the marksheet cannot be given to any “third person”.
Galgali appealed against the same, but Divisional Secretary C Y Chandekar also rejected his RTI plea stating the same reason.
A written notice under Section 11(1) of the RTI Act has to be served along with a fresh application, and the roll number of the person, his year of passing and full address needs to be provided, Galgali was told.
Later, he sought information if Tawde had cleared or failed his 10th and 12th standard examinations, but “got no response”.
Nawab Malik demanded that Tawde himself should declare his 10th standard and 12th standard marksheets, if he had nothing to hide.
In view of the Ganesh festival, the Western Railway (WR) will run Ganapati Special trains to Ratnagiri, Madgaon and Mangalore.
The trains shall be fully reserved and the fares chargeable will be inclusive of special charges.
WR in a statement issued today said, train no – 00115 Vasai Road – Mangalore Express will leave Vasai Road on September, 11th, 16th and 26th at 1.45 PM and reach Mangalore Junction at 11 AM next day.
Similarly train no – 00116 Mangalore – Vasai Road Express will leave Mangalore junction on September, 12th, 17th and 27th at 6 PM and will arrive at Vasai Road at 1 PM next day.
Train no 00117 – Vasai Road – Ratnagiri Express will leave Vasai Road on September, 13th, 14th, 18th, 19th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 28th and 29th at 1.45 PM and reach Ratnagiri at 10 PM on the same day.
Train No 00118 Ratnagiri-Vasai Road Express will leave Ratnagiri on September, 14th, 19th, 22nd, 23rd, 24th and 29th at 5 AM and will arrive Vasai Road at 1 PM the same day.
Train no – 00111 Vasai Road–Madgaon Express will leave Vasai Road on September 24 at 1.45 PM and reach Madgaon at 3 AM, the next day, while train no – 00112 Madgaon- Vasai Road Express will leave Madgaon on September, 11th, 16th, 21st and 26th September at 12.15 midnight and will arrive Vasai Road at 1 PM on the same day.
The booking for train no – 00115, 00117 and 00111 will be opened from September 10 at all Passenger Reservation System (PRS) counters and IRCTC website, it added.