Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court Mohit Shah retired after serving in the post for five years.
Shah, born on September 9, 1953 in Gujarat, assumed office of the Chief Justice of the high court on June 26, 2010.
During his five-year long tenure as the Chief Justice, Shah took suo motu cognizance of various social issues in Maharashtra, including condition of roads, of shelter homes, and providing education and other facilities to students with learning disabilities.
He started as a lawyer in the Gujarat High Court in 1976 and was elevated as a judge in the Gujarat High Court in September 1995.
He was appointed as the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court on December 24, 2009 after which he assumed office of the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court.
“I have served five years as Chief Justice of Bombay High Court. From my experience I feel the people here (in Mumbai) have a better sense of social responsibility and civic sense,” he said.
“I feel that we should test the efficacy of a law from a common man’s point of view. It should meet the expectations of the common man and not judges and lawyers,” Shah added.
From Wednesday, Justice V K Tahilramani will be the acting Chief Justice till a regular appointment is made.
A PIL has been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging Maharashtra government’s recent circular which says that sedition charges can be imposed on anybody who, by words, signs or visible representation, criticises politicians or elected representatives belonging to the government.
The High Court’s Division Bench, headed by Justice V M Kanade, today sought a response from the state government in two weeks.
The petitioner Narendra Sharma has contended that the circular dated August 27 amounts to violation onf the fundamental rights of a person and sought the High Court’s direction to quash and set it aside.
The circular says sedition clause can be invoked against “whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representation, is critical of politicians, elected representatives belonging to the government”.
The circular asks police to bear in mind that the sedition clause of IPC can be invoked against whoever, by “words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representation or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, dissatisfaction and provoking violence” against the central or state government.
However, the section 124-A will not be invoked against those trying to bring change in government through legal means without hatred and contempt, it said.
According to the petitioner, the circular can be misused by the police who may not have appropriate training and requisite experience to understand the consequences of imposing such stringent provisions of IPC.
The circular was issued following a direction from the Bombay High Court in March which had taken up suo moto cognizance of the issue following the arrest of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi.
A division bench headed by Chief Justice Mohit Shah had said sedition charges cannot be invoked on persons writing or saying anything in criticism of the government and its measures as far as it does not incite violence or cause public disorder.
After beef ban in Maharashtra, sale of meat has been prohibited for four days in Mumbai during the Jain community’s upcoming fasting period following a demand including from BJP, sparking a row with ally Shiv Sena denouncing it as “appeasement” and “religious terrorism”.
The order by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) Commissioner Ajoy Mehta came days after a civic body took a similar decision in the adjoining Thane district banning meat sale for eight days from September 11 to 18 when the Jain community will observe fasting period ‘Paryushan’.
Defending the civic body’s decision, Mumbai BJP unit’s general secretary Amarjeet Mishra said the ban has been imposed to protect the religious sentiments of the Jain community and that it should not be taken as a “targeted decision.”
According to the order passed by BMC — ruled by Sena and BJP– the ban on meat sale would be enforced on four days – September 10, 13, 17 and 18. Mehta did not reply to a message sent to him over the decision.
However, civic officials claimed that this is not a new decision and it has been in practice for last several years, adding that the prohibition will not affect the sale of fish and other seafood.
They said the step was taken in view of the growing demand not only by the Jain community, but also from some BJP corporators.
“On these four days, BMC slaughter houses will be shut and sale of meat will also be prohibited. The market department (of BMC) has been asked to enforce the ban and ensure no animal is slaughtered and no meat is sold anywhere in the city,” a senior civic official said.
Civic officials warned of stern action if the ban is violated.
The BJP insisted it was “not a ban” but “being tolerant towards very community in the spirit of secularism”. However, its ally Shiv Sena, which has a majority in the country’s richest corporation BMC, said the ban is unsupportable and alleged that the BJP was “trying to appease” some sections of the society.
Congress leader Sachin Sawant said the order was imposition of RSS ideology.
“Is it for the government to decide what I eat, what I drink, what I wear, where I sleep, when I speak…. What you are seeing across the country is the creeping spectre of Fascism,” Congress leader Manish Tewari said.
Shiv Sena’s Sanjay Raut equated the decision to “religious terrorism”.
“There are Sikhs, Muslims, Christians and Jains who consider themselves as minorities. And we respect them…But to dictate what we should eat…,” he said.
“The ban is unsupportable. The BMC has buckled under pressure from the BJP. The government should not take any decision to please a particular religious community and should function as per Constitution,” Sena spokesperson Neelam Gorhe said.
Opposing the order, the Qureshi community said their businesses will suffer heavy losses if the meat ban stays and they will approach the Mayor for its review. “If we don’t get justice, we will file a writ petition in High Court, go on a hunger strike and fight for our rights.”
The Maharashtra government had imposed a ban on beef in the state in March this year.
Union Human Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani on Tuesday said Congress President Sonia Gandhi’s ‘hawabaazi’ remark on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicated their own failures and their desire to hide it.
Speaking in favour of the Modi government, Irani said, “Sonia is forgetting is that the country gave Modi government a huge mandate in Lok Sabha.”
“She hit out at PM Modi to hide the short comings of her own party…it is laughable that the party that ruined the economy of this country is targeting the very person who is trying to revive it,” Irani added.
This comes after Sonia launched a sharp attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The party president, during a meeting of the Congress Working Committee, said that the Narendra Modi government is “out of touch” with the ground realities.
“The U-turn on Land Ordinance is evidence that government is out of touch with ground realities,” said Sonia. “Thanks to our party’s sustained campaign, the government has been compelled to withdraw its anti-farmer amendments,” she added.
This morning, at a top leadership meeting of the Congress, Sonia Gandhi accused PM Modi of “hawaa baazi (talking in the air)” and said he had failed abysmally to “match media events with actual accomplishments.”
“It has become painfully clear that most of the pledges made by the Prime Minister during his election campaign were nothing more than hawaa baazi,” Mrs Gandhi said.
“The Modi Government has failed abysmally to match words with deeds, to match media events with actual accomplishments. The economy is on a downward slide while prices continue on their unrelenting rise,” she added.
The PM, she said, had been reduced to “unedifying flip flops” which created confusion on what he really stood for.
It had earlier been speculated that Rahul Gandhi would take charge of the Congress, but the leaders say the 45-year-old is devoting his attention to rebuilding the party after its massive election defeat.
Unable to stomach the country’s rapid growth, anti-India forces are conspiring to inflict losses on strategic and critical installations in a bid to weaken its economy, Home Minister Rajnath Singh said.
Mr. Singh said India is counted among one of the biggest ‘Emerging Economies’ in the world and the country is poised to become a $7 trillion economy in the next five to eight years from the present $2 trillion.
“I am confident about it. India’s reputation has also increased in the international community. Anti-India forces are not able to digest these trends and they want to damage India’s important strategic and sensitive installations,” he said after reviewing the passing out parade of Assistant Commandants and Sub-Inspectors of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), at the National Industrial Security Academy (NISA).
“They (anti-India forces) will make continuous attempts to weaken India from economic and strategic point of view. And hence, you (CISF) need to face this challenge and I am hopeful you will emerge victorious,” Mr. Singh said.
Noting that terrorism is a big threat not only to India but to the whole world, the Minister said terror attacks have a long term impact on people.
“Anti-national forces are constantly keeping an eye on India and we need to give them a befitting reply. Such forces will make all out efforts to decimate India and there are no two opinions on this.”
Mr. Singh wondered why such forces resort to terror strikes on a peace-loving country like India, which is the only country that propagated the spirit of ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ (the entire world is a family).
“I am fully confident, that our para-military forces, our armed forces and CISF personnel have gained enough core competence to fight terrorism. I have full confidence that in case terrorists plan to attack any important strategic installation in the country you will foil their designs,” he said.
The Minister also said ‘Cyber Terrorism’ is an upcoming challenge wherein attackers use digital routes to target important installations. “I have been told the CISF personnel are imparted advanced training to tackle this menace.”
As many as 151 infants died in different hospitals here between April and July, reflecting a grim infant and child health care situation in Odisha which recently reported an alarming rate of deaths of newborns in Cuttack and Kandhamal.
The official statistics show the abysmal state of child health care in Kendrapara, which is the home district of state Health Minister Atanu Sabysachi Nayak, where several posts of paediatricians were lying vacant.
“While 22 neo-natal death cases of babies less than 28-days old were reported, 34 infant deaths were registered during April-July period. During the said period, 95 cases of babies dying during child-birth were recorded. All these cases were registered in government-run health institutions,” a district health official said.
“What has made matters worse is the vacancies of paediatricians posts in the government-run hospitals,” the senior official said.
Statistics of past four months show an average of nearly 38 newborns dying every month. Altogether 5,615 institutional deliveries were conducted during the period, the official said adding 128 infants were born at home since past four months.
Poor health infrastructure of child and maternity care are principally attributed to rise in cases of neo-natal and infants deaths, the official said.
The district accounts for 54 primary health centres, seven community health centres and 204 sub-centres while the district headquarters hospital at Kendrapara is the premier referral hospital.
As many as 11 posts of paediatric specialists have fallen vacant across the district while there are instances of health centre running without doctors. Pharmacists and paramedics run the heath service network in most places, the official added.
IAS and IPS officers may lose their job if they overstay on foreign assignments for more than a month without permission, as per the new rules being finalised by the government.
The move comes after it came to the notice that some bureaucrats were not reporting back to India after completion of their foreign postings. Few of them were also proceeding on unauthorised leave soon after completing their tenure abroad.
If an officer of all India service–Indian Administrative Service (IAS), Indian Police Service (IPS) and Indian Forest Service (IFoS), remains unauthorisedly absent after the sanctioned period of leave, study leave or tenure of foreign assignment, there shall be a one month waiting period, as per the draft rules.
After that, the state government concerned under whose cadre the officer hails from, shall issue a show cause notice, thereby giving him an opportunity to explain his case.
Thereafter, if the officer does not return to duty, the state government concerned shall initiate proceedings of deemed resignation and forward a proposal to the Centre for effecting it within next two months, it said.
In case the state government fails to comply with these instructions, the central government shall initiate proceedings of deemed resignation on its own, the draft rules formed by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) said.
As per existing rules, no officer of the three all India services shall be granted leave of any kind for a continuous period exceeding five years.
Also, an officer shall be deemed to have resigned from service if he is absent without authorisation for a period exceeding one year from the date of expiry of sanctioned leave or continues on foreign assignment beyond the period approved by the central government.
The DoPT has sent the new draft rules for comments to chief secretaries of state governments and union territories.
In a heartwarming post on Instagram, The Rock revealed he got two new French bulldog puppies (swoon) who immediately made a run for his backyard pool.
One was a natural swimmer, while one sank, causing the “San Andreas” star to dive into the water, fully (most-likely-designer) clothed, to save the baby dog (yep, still swooning).
“I take off into a full sprint, fully clothed, dive in the pool, swim to the bottom, rescue my brick, I mean BRUTUS and bring him back to the edge of the pool,” he continued. “He was a little delirious.. took a moment, threw up all the water he swallowed and looked up at me as if to say, ‘Thank God you didn’t have to give me mouth to mouth!’ and then ran off to play with his brother.” He captioned on Instagram.
Oscar-winning actress Nicole Kidman, who lives in Nashville with family, says she does not miss “the Hollywood life” because she has never been interested in fame.
The “Paddington” star moved to Nashville with husband Keith Urban, with whom she has two children, Faith, four and Sunday, seven, nine years ago and the actress said she has never looked back since.
“I don’t miss the Hollywood life, definitely not. But I don’t think I’ve ever been a part of that. I still put on a gown and go on the red carpet, and that’s when you’re all for a moment circling each other, and I know all those people.
“If you’re committed to a fame path that’s a whole different thing. But for me that’s almost like the burden that comes with it. I don’t say that complaining, but that’s the part that’s work so I can do the thing I love.”
The 48-year-old actress also said she has not always felt like she “fitted in” with those in Hollywood as she is “a bit of an outsider”.
“I don’t know if I’ve ever felt I fit in. I’ve always danced to the beat of my own drum. I’m left-handed; I think laterally. A bit of an outsider is how I would describe myself. “I was never the most popular girl at school. I don’t think I’ve been that person ever. I’m not the girl next door,” she said.