Home Blog Page 4312

‘Holy’entries in Bigg Boss?

Mumbaikars gave mixed reaction when asked about whether they will watch Bigg Boss if Radhe Maa and Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh participates in the show.

BigbossReality show Bigg Boss is known for casting controversial celebrities to attract viewers attention for garnering TRPs. As per media reports this time controversial self-styled godwoman Radhe Maa and Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh has been approached for the 9th Season of reality show ‘Big Boss’. Earlier controversial celebrities like Sunny Leone, Monica Bedi, Rohit Varma, Dolly Bindra, Rakhi Sawant, Kamal Rashid Khan, Sherlyn Chopra have participated in the show. The reality show a big hit and hot favourite of audiences as the contestants participate and spend 84 long days with each other within the house. The show already serves as re-launch pad for celebrities who have faded from the memory of audiences. If Radhe Maa agrees to be a part of Bigg Boss 9, it is quite possible that her participation on the show will give birth to innumerous controversies

When AV spoke to Satish Rohankar, a Kandivali resident he said, “Often it has been observed that Bigg Boss ropes in controversial celebrities to generate curiosity among viewers. If Radhe Maa participates in Bigg Boss then I will definitely watch it.”

Jayant Desle a Malad resident said, “Radhe Maa and Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh’s presence will definitely add charm to the show. Both of them have been in the news for wrong reasons.”

Rajesh Shah, a student from Dahisar said, “I won’t be watching Bigg Boss as my exams are scheduled in October. I will have to study for it and I won’t be wasting my time by watching this show.”

Piyush Singh, a Borivali resident said, “I don’t watch Bigg Boss and instead would be watching movies. My family members don’t like to watch reality shows as they like watch family oriented shows.”

Atul Bhave, a Kandivali resident said, “Gurmeet Ram Rahim is a rape accused, charge sheet is filed against him and he is also undergoing a murder trial. Needless to say he should not be treated as a celebrity!”

Radhe Maa has been in news for all wrong reasons in the recent past. She is already facing allegations of domestic violence and torture of one of her disciples. The godwoman made headlines, ever since pictures of hers in a mini-skirt went viral on social media. Ex- Bigg Boss contestant Dolly Bindra, a disciple of Radhe Maa, had accused Radhe Maa of forcing her into the sexual acts. Surendra Mitta a resident of Punjab’s Jalandhar has now accused Radhe Maa of harassment. He has come up with an audio tape in which he is allegedly being threatened by none other than the godwoman herself.

Few months back, Gurmeet’s maiden big screen outing ‘MSG: The Messenger’ had released as it had generated several controversies. Despite this, the film did not find many takers at the box office and received unflattering reviews.

Legalising to invite death?

The Supreme Court allowed the Jain practice of Santhara, which was earlier banned by a Rajasthan High Court order, and gave the Rajasthan government and the Centre four weeks to answer why it had opposed the practice. Last week, a Jain body had moved the Supreme Court challenging the Rajasthan High Court order declaring the ritual of Santhara or fasting unto death a penal offence. The petition by Akhil Bharat Varshiya Digambar Jain Parishad said that Santhara was not an act to terminate one’s life, but a vow intended to purify the soul from the karmas and it could not be equated with the offence of suicide.

According to a survey conducted in 2006, on an average 200 Jains practice sallekhana until death each year in India. Statistically, Sallekhana is undertaken both by men and women of all economic classes and among the educationally forward Jains. If we believe on the survey statistic, it is done by more women than men. In around 300 BC, Chandragupta Maurya (founder of the Maurya Empire) undertook Sallekhana atop Chandragiri Hill, Śravaṇa Beḷgoḷa, Karnataka. Acharya Shantisagar, a highly revered Digambara Jain saint of the modern India took Sallekana on 18 August, 1955. He decided to take the vow in July 1955, on account of inability to walk without help and weak eye-sight. He died on 18 September 1955. Sallekhana is often compared with suicide. According to Purushartha Siddhyupaya, when death is near, the vow of sallekhanā is observed by properly thinning the body and the passions. It also mentions that, sallekhanā is not suicide since the person observing it, is devoid of all passions like attachment.

Like most religions, Jainism forbids all forms of suicides. Suicide involves an intentional act of harm against oneself with a known outcome that negatively affects those left behind. It is believed that the precipitous taking of one’s life constitutes only a perpetuation of the karma from the current life (particularly that associated with negativity or suffering), which is thus “inherited” by the subsequent life to be assumed through reincarnation. Suicide does not allow escape from one’s karma, nor from one’s cycle of births and rebirths. However, in the practise of Sallekhana, it is viewed that death is “welcomed” through a peaceful, tranquil process that provides peace of mind and sufficient closure for the adherent, their family and/or community.

Whereas, suicide is an act of extreme desperation fuelled by anguish and hopelessness, a Sallekhana practitioner relinquishing food and drink voluntarily by this method has arrived at that decision after calm and unruffled introspection, with an intention to cleanse oneself of karmic encumbrances and thus attain the highest state of transcendental well-being. Sallekhana, for him/her, is therefore simply an act of spiritual purification premised on an exercise of individual autonomy. In both the writings of Jain Agamas and the general views of many followers of Jainism, due to the degree of self-actualisation and spiritual strength required by those who undertake the ritual, Sallekhana is considered to be a display of utmost piety, purification and expiation.

It is prescribed both for the householder and ascetics. Sallekhana is made up from two words sal (meaning ‘properly’) and lekhana, which means to thin out. Properly thinning out of the passions and the body is ‘Sallekhanā’. Sallekhana is allowed only when a person is suffering from incurable disease or great disability or when a person is nearing his end. It is a highly respected practice among the members of the Jain community. There is a similar Hindu practice known as Prayopavesa or Sanjeevan samadhi. Sallekhana is not an exercise in trying to achieve an unnatural death, but is rather a practice intrinsic to a person’s ethical choice to live with dignity until death. It should not be taken as to end the life. The person does not wish to die nor he/she is aspiring to live in a state of inability where he/she can’t undertake his/her own chores. The person is peacefully in observance of all the religious activities, spends maximum time in discussing and listening to the sermons and religious texts. There is a daily prayer for every devout member of Jain community wherein he/she wishes to be able to face death after having taken the vow of Sallekhana. Due to the prolonged nature of Sallekhana, the individual is given ample time to reflect on his or her life. The purpose is to purge old karmas and prevent the creation of new ones. According to Tattvartha Sutra (a compendium of Jain principles): “A householder willingly or voluntary adopts Sallekhana when death is very near.

In 2006 human rights activist Nikhil Soni and his lawyer Madhav Mishra, filed a Public Interest Litigation with the Rajasthan High Court. The PIL claimed that Sallekhana should be considered to be suicide under the Indian legal statute. They argued that Article 21 of the Indian constitution only guarantees the right to life, but not to death. The petition extends to those who facilitate individuals taking the vow of with aiding and abetting an act of suicide. In response, the Jain community argued that it is a violation of the Indian Constitution’s guarantee of religious freedom. It was argued that Sallekhana serves as a means of coercing widows and elderly relatives into taking their own lives. This landmark case sparked debate in India, where national bioethical guidelines have been in place since 1980. In August 2015, the Rajasthan High Court stated that the practice is not an essential tenet of Jainism and banned the practice making it punishable under section 306 and 309 (Abetment of Suicide) of the Indian Penal Code. On Monday, Supreme Court of India stayed the decision of Rajasthan High Court and lifted the ban on it.

Source various agencies.

I agreed to kill Sheena because Indrani Mukerjea told that Vidhie’s life was in danger: Sanjeev Khanna  

Sanjeev-KhannaIndrani Mukerjea’s former husband Sanjeev Khanna has reportedly told the Mumbai Police that he agreed to be part of the plot to kill Sheena Bora after he was told that his daughter Vidhie’s life may be in danger.

Sanjeev has told the cops that he was told by Indrani that Sheena and Mikhail may kill Vidhie.

Vidhie is Sanjeev’s and Indrani’s daughter.

Sheena and Mikhail are Indrani’s children from an earlier marriage (before Sanjeev) or relationship, it is not exactly confirmed.

Some reports have said that they are her children from her first husband Siddhart Das.

The report also said that this revelation could be crucial as Indrani’s could then be confirmed as a co-conspirator shoulders.

A police source saying that Khanna had admitted to his role in the murder and had said that he along with Indrani had strangled Sheena.

Khanna was supposedly told by Indrani that if Sheena and Mikhail were killed then Vidhie will be the only inheritor of Peter Mukerjea’s assets.

The former Star CEO’s Peter Mukerjea (Indrani’s current husband) assets are valued at several hundred crores.

Khanna is also believed to have told the cops that he regretted his act after he got to know that that Sheena and Michail did not have any plans to kill Vidhie

Khanna was arrested in Kolkata on Wednesday and then brought to Mumbai on Thursday.

Indrani was arrested, along with her former husband Khanna and her driver Shyam Rai in the sensational Sheena Bora murder case.

Indrani, Sanjeev, her driver resend to police custody till September 5

DriverThe court has extended the police custody TV tycoon Indrani Mukherjea, her ex-husband Sanjeev Khanna and her driver Shyam Rai till September 5 for questioning in the Sheena Bora murder case. Indrani has been accused of murdering her daughter Sheena along with the help of Sanjeev and Shyam in May 2012.

Soon after the order, Indrani fainted in the court briefly. Her daughter Vidhie also broke down in court on hearing the order. After Indrani’s divorce with Sanjeev, Vidhie was reportedly adopted by Indrani’s current husband and former Star India CEO Peter Mukherjea.

During the hearing, Indrani’s lawyers argued that the Mumbai police had been quizzed for long enough and there was no need for more time. “Approx 80 to 90 hours of questioning has been done. There is nothing remaining for which her custody is required,” her lawyers had argued in the court.

They also said that despite the court’s order, “not even one minute of private legal consultation has been allowed.” Indrani’s lawyer has moved an application to allow meeting her privately, without police presence.

Mumbai police has also included Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code in the remand application stating that Indrani attempted to kill her son Mikhail Bora as well. The remand application also says that there is suspicion of more people from outside state being involved in the act.

Police likely to conduct narco test on Indrani Mukerjea, her ex-husband Sanjeev

ex-husband-SanjeevIn an attempt to break the ‘tough nut’ Indrani and her former husband Sanjeev Khanna, accused in the sensational Sheena murder case, Mumbai Police may conduct a brain mapping and narco test on them.

In order to take the probe ahead, investigators may file an application seeking permission to subject the accused to narco, brain-mapping and lie detector tests.

Police have also written to Facebook seeking IP addresses as Sheena’s page was being updated even after her death.

Notably, Indrani Mukerjea’s son Mikhail Bora had emailed his sister Sheena Bora’s resignation letter to her employer Mumbai Metro One Private Limited (MMOPL.

However, while speaking, a relative of Mikhail had revealed that he sent the mail on his mother Indrani’s behest. Later, Mikhail even claimed that his mother tried to kill him too.

Meanwhile, a defence lawyer representing Indrani Mukerjea in the murder case, said that his client’s fundamental rights are being violated.

“Even a single minute was not given to us to consult Indrani Mukerjea privately. It is her fundamental right.” Defence lawyer Gunjan Mangla said.

She also complained about the police not complying with the Supreme Court order of allowing the lawyer to meet the client for legal consultations.

Mangla had also taken permission from the Bandra court to meet Indrani, but she was still not allowed to meet her.

Congress dubs Maharashtra CM Fadnavis’ Marathwada tour as ‘farce’

The Congress on Monday described the proposed three-day tour of Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to drought-hit Marathwada region from September 1, as a “farce” and said instead his government should announce concrete steps like farm loans waiver. Talking to reporters on Monday, Maharashtra state Congress president Ashok Chavan said that Fadnavis should have toured the drought-hit region long ago.

“People might say that it is better late than never, but he should announce some quick decisions like loan waiver,” Chavan said.

Union Agriculture Minister Radhamohan Singh visited the state twice, a Central team toured the area thrice and now Fadnavis is also going on his tour, Chavan said, adding that instead of such a “farce”, his government should announce concrete steps.

“The situation in rural areas is explosive because of acute water scarcity and drought like conditions. We have been touring drought hit areas for the last few days. At none of these places, have farmers loans been rescheduled,” he said.

Union Agriculture Minister Radhamohan Singh had announced a Rs 25,000 compensation per hectare for hailstorm affected farmers during his visit on April 1, 2015, he said.

“However, his assurance was an April Fool’s Day joke because the farmers are yet to get any compensation,” he claimed.

Chavan described the Modi government’s decision to allow the Land Acquisition Ordinance to lapse as a “victory of the leadership of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi”. Chavan said that All Indian Congress Committee (AICC) president Sonia Gandhi and party vice-president Rahul Gandhi had rallied opposition parties in the country against the Land Acquisition Ordinance and led the agitation from the front.

“The BJP government has retreated with an eye on the Bihar assembly polls. It is a victory for the Congress which was in the forefront in building public opinion against the Land Acquisition Ordinance,” Chavan said. He said that there was tremendous unrest among farmers against the Land Acquisition Ordinance and finally the Modi government had to bow down before the wishes of the people.

Replying to a question about Union Minister Nitin Gadkari’s statement that the government had exposed the Congress’s anti-development face, Chavan said that the Centre is patting its own back after its retreat on the Land Acquisition Ordinance. Chavan said that reports that the Maharashtra government plans to lift reservation of tribal (adivasi) land, is “shocking”.

Counterfeit goods real challenge to ‘Make in India’ 

Production of low-quality counterfeit goods has the potential to significantly undermine the ‘Make in India’ programme that seeks to establish the country as a global manufacturing hub, a report has said.

The counterfeit market is growing at a rate of 44 per cent per annum and has touched Rs 1.05 lakh crore in size in 2014, according to ‘Sell SMART’ report by industry body FICCI and consultancy firm KPMG.

As a consequence, since 2010, India has been on the US’ `Priority Watch List’ of countries more exposed to IPR (intellectual property rights) violations globally, it said.

Alcohol, consumer packaged goods, personal care products, tobacco, mobile and mobile components, auto parts and computer software and hardware are the sectors that are most prone to counterfeiting, the report said.

It added, of the total bogus goods sold in the country in 2014, FMCG, alcoholic beverages and tobacco accounted for a staggering 65 per cent.

Production of low-quality counterfeit goods has the potential to significantly undermine the goal of ‘Make in India’ programme. Counterfeiting is a challenge to the government and its most direct impact is felt through the loss of tax revenue, the report said.

In 2014, the government lost about Rs 39,200 crore in tax collections to the counterfeit trade, an increase of 50 per cent from Rs 26,100 crore in 2012. Of this, FMCG and alcoholic beverages sectors accounted for a loss of about Rs 27,500 crore, or about 70 per cent, it added.

“Counterfeit goods is a huge issue that needs to be addressed. Counterfeiting is more prevalent in rural and semi- urban areas compared to urban areas,” KPMG Partner Rajat Wahi said.

Indrani charged with poisoning son

Indrani Mukerjea, wife of former Star India CEO Peter Mukerjea, faced fresh charges of poisoning and attempting to murder her son Mikhail on the day her daughter Sheena was killed more than three years ago as police suspect involvement of people outside the state in the sensational crime.

Seeking further custody of the three key accused–Indrani, former husband Sanjeev Khanna and driver Shyam Rai–in the Sheena murder case, police told a metropolitan court they would like to establish a “financial trail” in the crime.

Meanwhile, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate S M Chandgade extended their police custody till September 5.

Mikhail, Indrani’s son with her first husband Sidharth Das, had earlier told the police that she had thrice attempted to kill him and also spiked his drink the day Sheena disappeared in April 2012. Mikhail, who lives in Guwahati, and Sheena were Indrani’s children with Das.

There were emotional scenes in the court when Indrani hugged Vidhie, her daughter with Khanna, in the court and was seen crying. Indrani felt uneasy during the proceedings after which she was given water and allowed to sit.

Their faces covered in black veil, all the three accused were produced before the magisterial court amid tight security shortly before 3 pm. Their veils were briefly lifted when the Magistrate asked them whether they had any complaint (against the police), to which they replied in the negative.

After their police remand was extended, they were taken to the Khar police station where Mumbai Police Commissioner Rakesh Maria, who himself is keenly supervising the probe, also arrived for interrogating them. What transpired during the interrogation was not immediately known.

Earlier, Chandgade rejected the contention of defence lawyers Gunjan Mangla and Hrishikesh Mundergi, appearing for Indrani and Khanna, that as the two were in police custody for sufficient time the remand should not be extended.

Manhunt on to nab those who kidnapped and murdered housewife

The police has begun a manhunt for some unknown people who allegedly kidnapped a housewife, strangulated her and dumped her body in the Kasara ghat, a Kalyan MFC police station official said.

The police said that it was a couple of days ago when the Kasara police station found the victim’s body in the ravine, after which a case was registered.

Later, it was on August 30, 2015 that the MFC police station registered a case under Section 302, Section 364 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown people in connection with the housewife’s murder.

According to a police complaint some unknown as well as unidentified people kidnapped her from her residence between August 12 and August 13, 2015 when she was alone at home.

Allegedly, killed her and dumped her body in the Kasara ghat, the police said. The motive behind the kidnap and murder is still not known, the police said.

The local police is probing the crime and is looking for those accused.

Frame compensation scheme for boy-victims of sexual assault: HC

The Bombay High Court asked Maharashtra government to come out with a scheme for giving compensation to boys who are victims of sexual assault, on the lines of an existing one for female victims.

Incidents of sexual assault on boys at remand homes in Maharashtra are on rise and there is a need to formulate a scheme for rehabilitation of the victims, the division bench headed by Justice V M Kanade said.

“Why no separate scheme for boys has been formulated?” said the judges, directing the state to inform them at the next hearing after two weeks what it has done in this regard.

‘Manodhairya’ scheme for women rape victims was launched in 2013 by the state with a provision of compensation.

The HC was hearing a suo motu (on its own) petition about a sexual assault case at Kavdas orphanage in Shahpur. The sessions court had convicted six persons, including the orphanage owner, of sexually assaulting and starving 18 minor mentally-challenged inmates, five of them girls.

Taking a suo motu cognisance of the case, the HC had ordered the government to inquire into the working of all the state-aided orphanages. As a result of the PIL, a state coordination committee for child protection was formed and Dr Asha Bajpai was appointed an ‘amicus curiae’ (friend of court). Bajpai also heads the five-member committee.

The government today submitted a report on compliance of July 3 order of the HC which had asked the state to rehabilitate the victims.