Home Blog Page 295

Olympic gold medalist Neeraj Chopra names his three favourite Women’s Premier League stars

neeraj chopra, chopra, olympic
Olympic gold medalist Neeraj Chopra names his three favourite Women's Premier League stars 2

Star India javelin thrower and Olympic gold medalist Neeraj Chopra revealed his three favorite stars from the ongoing inaugural edition of the Women’s Premier League (WPL). In a video posted by the official Twitter handle of the tournament, Neeraj said that his top three favorite players in the league are Harmanpreet Kaur, Smriti Mandhana, and Shafali Verma.

“My favorite three players are Harmanpreet Kaur. I have watched her play. Smriti Mandhana plays really well. I have also seen Shafali Verma perform, and she will do well in the future,” said Neeraj.

Mumbai Indians (MI) skipper Harmanpreet Singh has showcased great form in the WPL. In eight innings, she has scored 244 runs at an average of 40.66, with three fifties, a strike rate of 144.37, and the best score of 65*. Shafali Verma has also performed well for the Delhi Capitals. In eight matches, she has scored 241 runs at an average of 34.42. She has scored two half-centuries, with the best score of 84. Her strike rate is 182.57.

Smriti, on the other hand, had an underwhelming WPL. She could score only 149 runs in eight matches at an average of 18.62 and a strike rate of over 111. Her best score in the tournament was 37. On his experience of meeting the U-19 T20 World Cup winning team India in South Africa and attending the WPL eliminator between Mumbai Indians and UP Warriorz, Neeraj said, “I met the Indian women’s team for the first time during the ICC U-19 Women’s T20 World Cup.” I was in South Africa for my training. India won the tournament, and it felt good. I have seen the WPL; the atmosphere is good. “The way people are supporting women’s cricket and the quality of matches is really great.”

Neeraj said that with time, the WPL will only get better as a tournament. Mumbai Indians will square off with Delhi Capitals in the title clash of the inaugural Women’s Premier League (WPL) at Brabourne Stadium in Mumbai on Sunday.

Both teams have had a remarkable journey in the WPL so far. Delhi Capitals finished at the top of the points table with six wins, two losses, and 12 points to get a direct ticket to the final. The Mumbai Indians, the second-placed team with six wins, two losses, and 12 points, advanced to the final after beating the third-placed UP Warriorz by 72 runs in the eliminator. Mumbai Indians Women Squad: Hayley Matthews, Yastika Bhatia(w), Nat Sciver-Brunt, Harmanpreet Kaur(c), Melie Kerr, Pooja Vastrakar, Issy Wong, Amanjot Kaur, Humaira Kazi, Jintimani Kalita, Saika Ishaque, Heather Graham, Chloe Tryon, Dhara Gujjar, Sonam Yadav, Neelam Bisht, Priyanka Bala

Delhi Capitals Women Squad: Meg Lanning(c), Shafali Verma, Jemimah Rodrigues, Marizanne Kapp, Alice Capsey, Jess Jonassen, Arundhati Reddy, Taniya Bhatia(w), Radha Yadav, Shikha Pandey, Poonam Yadav, Jasia Akhtar, Laura Harris, Tara Norris, Minnu Mani, Aparna Mondal, Titas Sadhu, and Sneha Deepthi.

Shah defends K’taka’s decision to scrap 4% reservation for Muslims, says quota based on religion not valid constitutionally

amit shah, karnataka, shah, muslim reservation, reservation, muslims
Shah defends K'taka’s decision to scrap 4% reservation for Muslims, says quota based on religion not valid constitutionally 4

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Sunday lauded the Karnataka government’s decision to scrap the four per cent reservation for Muslims under the 2B Other Backward Classes (OBCs) category, saying the quota on religious lines was constitutionally invalid.

Addressing public gatherings at Gorata village in Bidar district and Gabbur in Raichur district, he slammed the Congress for introducing the four per cent reservation for Muslims for “vote bank politics”.

The Union Minister pointed out that the Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai-led BJP government also tried to do away with the injustice to the Scheduled Castes by introducing a new internal reservation.

The entire 2B category was only for the Muslims, and the BJP government scrapped it, saying that it was not constitutionally tenable, and divided the four per cent quota equally among the two dominant communities of the state: Vokkaligas in the 2C reservation category and the Veerashaiva-Lingayats in the 2D reservation category.

This rendered 2B obsolete, while the Vokkaligas’ reservation increased from 4% to 6% and the Lingayats’ from 5% to 7%.

“The BJP never believed in appeasement.” “So, it decided to change the reservation,” Shah said, strongly defending the decision.

“The BJP abolished the four per cent reservation given to the minorities and gave two per cent to the Vokkaligas and two per cent to the Lingayats,” Shah said.

“The reservation for minorities is not constitutionally valid. There is no provision in the Constitution to grant reservations based on religion. This Congress government did it for its appeasement politics and gave reservations to the minorities,” he added.

RBI may go in for 25 basis point interest rate hike in monetary policy meet next month, say experts

interest rate hike, interest rate, rbi, reserve bank of india, repo rate
RBI may go in for 25 basis point interest rate hike in monetary policy meet next month, say experts 6

With retail inflation remaining above the comfort level of 6 per cent and most global peers including US Fed continuing hawkish stance, the Reserve Bank of India too may go in for a 25 basis points hike in the bi-monthly monetary policy to be announced on April 6, opined experts.

The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Reserve Bank will be meeting for three days on April 3, 5 and 6 to take into account various domestic and global factors before coming out with the first bi-monthly monetary policy for fiscal 2023-24.

The two key factors which the committee will deliberate intensely while firming up the next monetary policy are elevated retail inflation and the recent action taken by central banks of the developed nations especially the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England.

The Reserve Bank on India (RBI) has been raising benchmark rates since May 2022 to contain inflation which has been largely driven by external factors, especially the disruption of the global supply chain following the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war.

In its last policy meeting held in February, RBI had raised the policy rate or repo by 25 basis points to 6.50 per cent.

Having remained below six per cent for two months (November and December 2022), the retail inflation breached the comfort zone warranting action by the Reserve Bank.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI)-based inflation was 6.52 per cent in January and 6.44 per cent in February.

”Given that CPI inflation has been 6.5 per cent and 6.4 per cent in the last two months and that liquidity is now near neutral, we may expect the RBI to raise rates once again by 25 bps and probably change stance to neutral to signal that this cycle is over,” opined Madan Sabnavis, Chief Economist, Bank of Baroda.

India Ratings and Research Chief Economist D K Pant too expects the central bank to raise policy rate by 25 bps (basis points).

”This is likely to be last rate hike in present policy tightening cycle,” he said, and added that inflation trajectory from here is going to decline due to impact of past policy rate hikes, softening of global commodity prices, and base effect.

Meanwhile, Ranen Banerjee, Partner, Economic Advisory Services, PwC India, said that the risk of dis-anchoring the inflation expectations by going for a pause owing to the banking turmoil has forced the US Fed, ECB and BoE to raise the policy rates. The speech of US Fed chair clearly articulates that there is going to be less hawkishness going forward.

The case for disengagement of the Indian monetary policy moves with the US Fed has become stronger and the probability of a pause by the RBI on rate hikes has increased, he said.

”Given that inflation in India is more from supply side factors, as dissented by two of the MPC members in the last MPC meeting, we could possibly now have a majority of MPC members voting for a pause,” Banerjee said.

In all the Reserve Bank will hold six MPC meets in the fiscal 2023-24.

The central government has tasked the RBI to ensure that retail inflation remains at 4 per cent with a margin of 2 per cent on the either side.

On expectations from the April MPC meet, Suvodeep Rakshit, senior economist, Kotak Institutional Equities, said the RBI had been hawkish in the last policy and has consistently highlighted the concerns on elevated core and headline CPI inflation.

”With the ECB, BoE and the Fed sticking to their expected rate hike path, the RBI is likely to hike repo rate by 25 bps in the April policy,” Rakshit said.

Earlier this month, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said despite the multiple shocks to the global economy from the pandemic, the Ukraine war and synchronised monetary policy tightening across the world, the domestic economy and financial sector are stable and the worst of inflation is behind us.

Martyr PM’s son who walked for national unity can never insult country: Congress’s Priyanka

priyanka, gandhi, rahul gandhi, vadra, Sankalp Satyagraha, disqualification, congress
Martyr PM's son who walked for national unity can never insult country: Congress's Priyanka 8

On Sunday, Congress general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said a martyred prime minister’s son who walked thousands of kilometres for national unity can never insult the country, as the Congress held a nationwide protest against the disqualification of Rahul Gandhi from the Lok Sabha.

Priyanka Gandhi was addressing the ‘Sankalp Satyagraha’ at Rajghat — the memorial of Mahatma Gandhi — here to protest against Rahul Gandhi’s conviction in a 2019 defamation case and his subsequent disqualification from the Lok Sabha. She said the time had come to raise a voice against an ”arrogant government” as barring Rahul Gandhi from contesting elections does not bode well for the country and its democracy.

The Congress has launched a day-long satyagraha at all states and district headquarters to protest against Gandhi’s conviction in a 2019 defamation case and his subsequent disqualification from the Lok Sabha.

Gandhi was disqualified from the Lok Sabha on Friday, a day after a court in Gujarat’s Surat convicted him in the defamation case. The disqualification will prevent Gandhi (52), a four-time MP, from contesting elections for eight years unless a higher court upholds the conviction. The Congress leader alleged that Rahul Gandhi was disqualified for questioning the prime minister about industrialist Gautam Adani, and people will give a befitting reply to those behind the action.

”My family’s blood has ploughed democracy in this country. We are ready to do anything for this country’s democracy. Great leaders of the Congress laid the foundation of democracy in this country. ”Time has come and we are not the ones who will remain silent anymore,” she told the crowd outside Rajghat.

Asking if a martyred prime minister’s son can insult the country, Priyanka Gandhi said, “This is an insult to that prime minister who gave his life.”  You have called a martyr’s son anti-national, Mir Jafar, and insulted his mother in Parliament. The prime minister in Parliament asks why this family does not use the “Nehru” surname. You insult the entire family and the tradition of Kashmiri Pandits.  But there is no case against you. You don’t get a case or a two-year term, and no one disqualifies you. “Why?” she asked.

Priyanka Gandhi said that till today, they have been insulting “our family, and we remained silent but not any more”.

”How much will you insult one person?” she said, and she asked if Lord Ram, who was sent into “exile, was a ”parivaarwadi”.

The leader of the Congress, who alleged that the country’s wealth was being looted and given to one person, said this wealth belongs to the people and no one can take it away.

“When arrogant dictators are unable to answer the questions raised, they try to suppress those who ask the questions.”

”This entire cabinet, government, and MPs are trying to save one person and are not holding an inquiry. Who is this Adani, in whose support everyone comes the moment his name crops up?” she asked.

Questioning if this was the ”mother of democracies, she asked why people are still unemployed if the economy is doing so well.

Noting that lakhs of people joined Rahul Gandhi on his Bharat Jodo Yatra when he walked from Kanyakumari to Kashmir, Priyanka Gandhi said, “Can a person who walks from Kanyakumari to Kashmir to unite the country insult the country?” Coming out in support of her brother, she asserted that Rahul Gandhi wants the poor, youth, and women to get their rights, and what belongs to them should go into their hands and not to someone who is a big man and the prime minister’s “friend.”

She said Rahul Gandhi studied at Harvard and Cambridge — the best universities in the world — but still they call him “Pappu.”

“When they came to know that he is not Pappu and lakhs of people are walking with him, they got disturbed over the questions he raised in Parliament to which they don’t have answers.” They have to do all this to stop just one person.

“This country’s prime minister is a coward.” Take me to jail, but the truth is that this country’s prime minister is a coward. He is hiding behind his power, and (he) is arrogant. But this country’s tradition is that people reply to an arrogant king. This country recognizes an arrogant king. “This country knows the truth,” she said.

Priyanka Gandhi also urged the media to understand their responsibility because “democracy is in danger.”

”If the one who asks the question is barred from contesting elections for eight years, it is not right for the country or its democracy. The time has come to “daromat” (don’t be afraid)’. ”Time has come to face them, unite, ensure the unity of the country, and take it forward,” she asserted amid cheers from the Congress rank and file.

“My name not Savarkar, it is Gandhi and Gandhi never offers an apology” Rahul Gandhi on LS disqualification

rahul gandhi, gandhi, disqualification, congress, adani, Savarkar
"My name not Savarkar, it is Gandhi and Gandhi never offers an apology" Rahul Gandhi on LS disqualification 10

On Saturday, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said that he was not Veer Savarkar and that he would not apologize. Addressing a press conference in the national capital a day after he was convicted in a defamation case and subsequently disqualified from Lok Sabha, Gandhi said, “My name is not Savarkar, my name is Gandhi. Gandhis don’t apologize to anyone.”

He further stated that he is not scared of going to prison and that his disqualification from Parliament was aimed at distracting people from the Adani issue. He alleged that the BJP-led central government is allegedly protecting businessman Gautam Adani, who has been accused of stock manipulation.

“The moot question remains as to who invested Rs 20,000 crore in Adani shell firms. “I will keep asking the question,” the former Wayanad MP said. “Why is the BJP-led center allegedly protecting the businessman Gautam Adani? “Kyuki aap hi Adani ho,” he alleged.

Gandhi added, “The whole game of disqualification and allegations by ministers is aimed at distracting people from the Adani issue.” He also alleged that the Prime Minister was scared of the “next speech that is going to come on Adani”. “I have seen it in his eyes. That is why, first the distraction and then the disqualification,” Rahul Gandhi said.

On being asked about the BJP’s allegations of insulting the OBC community, he said, “I have always talked about brotherhood; this is not about OBCs.” Hitting out at the BJP-led central government, Gandhi said, “For this government, the country is Adani, and Adani is a country.”

Reacting to his disqualification from the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi said that even if he is permanently disqualified, he will keep doing his job. He expressed his gratitude to the opposition parties for extending support to him and said, “All of us will work together.”

He added, “I am here to defend the democratic voice of the people of India.” I will continue to do that. I am not scared of anyone.” “My job is to defend the democratic nature of the country, which means defending the institutions of the country, defending the voice of the poor people of the country, and telling people the truth about people like Adani who are exploiting the relationship they have with the PM,” Gandhi said.

Rahul Gandhi also said that he had asked the Speaker to let him respond on the floor of the House to the allegations over his London remarks and the charge that he had sought the intervention of international forces in the domestic affairs of the country. “BJP leaders claimed that I am helping anti-India forces.” I told the Speaker that it was my right to respond to these allegations. “But he didn’t allow me,” he said. “I have only one step, and that’s to fight for the truth and to defend the democratic nature of this country. “Disqualify me for life, jail me for life, I will continue going.”

The BJP, meanwhile, doubled down on Gandhi, with former Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad stating that the Congress leader was facing the heat for his speech in 2019. “Today he said that ‘I speak thoughtfully,” which means whatever Rahul Gandhi said in 2019 was spoken thoughtfully,” Prasad said in a press conference in Patna. The former union minister said that the Congress was attempting to project Rahul Gandhi as a victim for electoral gains in Karnataka. “He is not the only one; 32 leaders have been disqualified across the country, including six from the BJP,” Prasad said.

Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal said that the Congress leader was able to speak because there is democracy in this country. “He is the one speaking the most against Modi ji and still says that his voice is being strangled,” Meghwal said. On Friday, Gandhi was disqualified as a member of the Lok Sabha, a day after a Surat court sentenced him to two years’ imprisonment in a defamation case filed against him over his “Modi surname” remark.

In April 2019, he made the remark “How come all the thieves have Modi as the common surname?” at a Lok Sabha election rally in Kolar, Karnataka. The court approved Gandhi’s bail on a surety and stayed the sentence for 30 days to allow him to approach the higher courts.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi disqualified as a Member of Parliament from Wayanad

rahul gandhi, wayanad, gandhi, member of parliament, mp
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi disqualified as a Member of Parliament from Wayanad 12

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has been disqualified from the Lok Sabha, the Lok Sabha Secretariat said on Friday.

His disqualification as Wayanad MP is effective from March 23, the day of his conviction, the secretariat said in its notification.

A court in Surat sentenced Rahul Gandhi to two years in jail in a defamation case on Thursday, filed on a complaint by BJP MLA Purnesh Modi, for his alleged remark, ”How come all thieves have Modi as the common surname?”

SC says mere membership of banned outfits enough to mean UAPA offence

supreme court of india, supreme court, sc, uapa, uapa offence, 2011 verdict
SC says mere membership of banned outfits enough to mean UAPA offence 14

The Supreme Court held on Friday as bad in law its 2011 verdicts that ruled that mere membership in a banned organization will not make a person a criminal unless he resorts to violence or incites others to violence.

While deciding a reference made by a two-judge bench, a bench of Justices MR Shah, CT Ravikumar, and Sanjay Karol held that mere membership in a banned organization makes a person criminal and subject to prosecution under UAPA provisions.

The bench said the subsequent decisions passed by high courts pursuant to its two-judge verdicts in 2011 on the membership of banned outfits are bad in law and should be overruled. While allowing petitions of the Centre and the Assam government seeking review of the apex court’s 2011 verdicts on the membership of banned outfits, the court said the Union government was required to be heard when a provision enacted by Parliament is read down. 

The top court stated that the 2011 verdicts were issued based on American court decisions, which cannot be done without taking into account the situation in India. “In India, the right to freedom of speech and expression is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions.” However, the bench stated that decisions of American courts can be used as a guideline. 

On February 9, the top court, while reserving its verdict on a batch of review pleas, noted that the Union of India was not heard by its two-judge benches when the 2011 verdict was passed, reading down Section 3(5) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (now repealed).

On February 3, 2011, the Supreme Court acquitted suspected ULFA member Arup Bhuyan, who had been found guilty by a TADA court on the basis of his alleged confessional statement before the Superintendent of Police, and stated that mere membership in a banned organization does not make a person a criminal unless he resorts to violence or incites people to violence or causes public disorder through violence or incitement to violence.

Similar views were expressed by the Supreme Court in two other 2011 decisions, Indra Das vs. State of Assam and State of Kerala vs. Raneef, in which the bench relied on three US Supreme Court decisions that rejected the doctrine of “guilt by association.”

SC directs all convicts, undertrials released during pandemic to surrender in 15 days

Maharashtra Political Crisis Supreme court, supreme court of india, sc, supreme court, justices, judges, high court
Image: PTI

The Supreme Court ordered on Friday that all convicts and undertrial prisoners who were released during the COVID-19 pandemic to decongest jails surrender within 15 days.

A bench of Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar said undertrial prisoners, who were released on emergency bail during the pandemic, can move for regular bail before competent courts after their surrender.

The bench stated that “all convicts who were released during the COVID-19 pandemic after their surrender can move competent courts for suspension of their sentence.”

Several convicts and undertrial prisoners, mostly those who were booked for non-heinous offenses, were released during the pandemic in various states on the recommendations of a high-powered committee set up pursuant to directions of the apex court.

Lalbaug murder: Crime Patrol inspires daughter to kill her Mother

rimple jain, mother, murder case, lalbaug murder, rimple, sandwich, murder in mumbai, mumbai police
Lalbaug murder: Crime Patrol inspires daughter to kill her Mother 17

This is one of the very depressing murder of a mother by her 23-year-old daughter Rimple Jain in Mumbai. On December 27, there was a dispute between Rimple and her mother. The mother was pushed hard to death out of anger. After killing Veena, Rimple wanted to dispose of the body. She tried to dissolve the body parts using phenyl and acid, but when it didn’t work as fast as she expected it to, she stopped trying it and kept other body parts in the cupboard, packing them in a polythene bag. Rimple and her mother, Veena, lived in the Ibrahim Kasim Chawl in Lalbaug. The bustling 100-year-old chawl is home to scores of families and is also located right on the main road.

She first separated her mother’s hands from the body, after which she chopped off the lower legs and then the thighs. Subsequently, she severed her head and stuffed the torso into a gunny sack, which was placed inside the cupboard that it was recovered from. She would douse the entire house with room fresheners and perfume every day to keep the stench at bay.

Rimple, however, had spent all her money on the cutting machine and started getting food on credit from the Shri Sai Fast Food Centre on the ground floor of the chawl. The eatery manager, Umesh Khavare, is now a key witness in the case, and the police have recovered text messages he exchanged with Rimple. Khavare has told the police that Rimple claimed to have spent all her money on sending Veena to Kanpur for treatment after her fall. As the days passed, Rimple even made Khavare recharge her mobile phone. From January to March 10, Rimple racked up pending dues of Rs 2,006.

She even lied to her boyfriend, who worked as a manager at a Chinese restaurant in her building. She told him that her house was emitting a foul smell due to her bathroom being choked up. She didn’t allow anyone in the house, especially after the chopping of the body. She told her boyfriend that her mother had gone to Rajasthan with her brother. She, however, told the sandwich stall owner that her mother had died and the body had been taken away for last rites.

The constant milling around of her neighbors, as well as her increasing fear of getting caught, kept matricide accused Rimple Jain confined to her house for four months, even as the stench of the rotting, dismembered corpse grew stronger with each passing day. Rimple was getting increasingly paranoid as some of her relatives lived in the same locality and could come visit at any time. In fact, this was exactly how the crime was discovered in the first place: when her cousin visited her, smelled a rat due to her behavior, and informed the cops.

Veena’s prolonged absence had started raising their suspicions as well. To further keep the impression of normalcy alive, Rimple started strolling up and down the common passage outside her house with her phone stuck to her ear every evening, pretending to talk to her mother on the phone. There are always people present in and around the chawl until 2 am, and the tea stall outside the chawl opens up for business at 4 am. Hence, Rimple was unable to find a suitable time to dispose of the corpse, as she feared that she would be spotted and caught.

Her neighbors had already started becoming suspicious after two staffers of a restaurant outside the chawl took Veena to her house following her fall on the morning of December 27, 2022. The staffers had offered to take Veena to a doctor, but Rimple had refused their help. Subsequently, when her neighbors started asking about Veena, she made up a story about her mother having gone to Kanpur.

When police probed the reason, Rimpy said she was scared that her uncle and other relatives had found out that my mother was dead; they would have thrown her out of her Lalbaug home and appropriated her parent’s bank balance and property. That’s why she cooked up a story of her mother’s Kanpur visit instead. Rimple continued to deny killing her 55-year-old mother, Veena. Meanwhile, a police investigation revealed that Rimple decided to dispose of the body and purchased a marble cutter within six hours of her mother’s death.

Rimple was uncooperative in the probe, and police wanted to know from her how exactly she had killed her mother. Also, they wanted to determine the role of six of her close contacts, of which her boyfriend and the sandwich seller are important people yet to be questioned. The sandwich vendor, who has been grilled by cops for the third day in a row, revealed that he knew Rimple’s mother was dead. 

On December 27, when he went to Rimple’s home, he saw the mother lying on the bed. He told Rimple that she was dead, to which Rimple responded positively. However, the sandwich seller denied helping Rimple hack his body. The man went to UP on January 7, 2023, 12 days after the death. Veena Prakash Jain was last seen alive by one of the neighbors on December 26. The alleged murderer, Rimple Jain, lived with her, and after the murder, he used to spray perfumes and room fresheners to suppress the foul smell. A Class 12 dropout, Rimple lost her father around 20 years ago.


Since then, she and her mother have been living alone and mostly dependent on her uncle. Though this is not the first such case, somewhere the relations are deteriorating and bringing such extreme repercussions to their hate and anger. It is getting difficult to understand the psyche of this young generation, and they have become so insensitive in their conduct.

HC suggests reservation for transgenders in govt jobs, but do we have a suitable environment yet?

transgender, workspace, india, transgenders, lgbt, lgbtq, high court, bombay high court, jobs, government jobs, maharashtra government
HC suggests reservation for transgenders in govt jobs, but do we have a suitable environment yet? 19

The Bombay High Court has asked the Maharashtra government to consider giving transgender people preference in state-run educational institutions and government jobs. 

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice S V Gangapurwala and Justice Sandeep Marne directed a state-appointed committee to consider the case and report back by June 7. When Advocate General Birendra Saraf sought more time, the court remarked, “If there is a hanging sword, then things move faster.”

Vinayak Kashid, a transgender who is a graduate in electrical engineering and a postgraduate in technology (electrical power system engineering), filed a petition seeking modification to the advertisement issued by MahaTransco in May this year for mass recruitment to include the transgender category.

Many transgender people believe that the third category should be present in recruitment drives and workplaces, and that educational institutions should set up awareness campaigns for the community so that people will have acceptance as members of society. We also spoke with some transgender activists to get their take on the Bombay High Court’s proposal to give transgender people reservations in government jobs.

Gauri Sawant, a transgender activist, told Afternoon Voice, “We are struggling for the government jobs, and even if the jobs are available, people in our society do not accept it, and people from our community who are not willing to gain education or work in government offices then there should at least be skill development for them.”


Also read: Pet parents of Mumbai are Panic; Govt should instruct rigid housing societies with new GR


Alpana Dange, consulting research director of Hamsafar Trust, said, “Many people in our community are still afraid of their professional jobs as they are being bullied; some are told to get into sex work.” There should be various awareness events for these people about which words or slang should not be used in their work environment.

We also asked if people in the transgender community are still afraid of being rejected for these jobs or if they can work safely in those professional jobs. “It will take time to remove fear from the minds of the transgender community so that they can also work with other sets of people,” Dange continued, “but awareness of this community can help them as well as others in the society.” Also, if other people are not accepting them, then they should talk about it to understand the myth and why transgender people have to face different treatment than others.”

“Though there are job openings for the transgender community, many of them are not given opportunities because 80 percent of them are not literate,” model-and-actress Navvya Singh said. “If people are not willing to take jobs or educate our people, then the government should at least come up with skill development courses so that we can survive.”

Many trans people still struggle to be recognized, and if someone applies for a job and identifies as a woman, they should be considered a woman. “People in our community mostly fear rejection if they are not selected for the job, and how would others treat them even if they are working,” Singh continued.

“Even if the reservation is implemented,” says Harish Iyer, an equal rights activist, “many people are still unaware of the trans communities, which makes people from our community feel uncomfortable working in a professional environment, and people are also bullied even when they are applying for interviews, so there should be awareness and sensitization programs set up in the corporate and government sectors.”