Home Blog Page 5466

Supreme Court defers hearing in IPL match-fixing case till March 25

Gurunath-MeiyappanThe Supreme Court of India on Friday deferred hearing on the findings of the Justice Mudgal Committee investigation into corruption in the lucrative Indian Premier League (IPL) tournament and posted the matter for next hearing on March 25.

Earlier, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) filled an affidavit in which it requested the apex court not to reveal the contents of the sealed envelope submitted by the Mudgal committee.

A three-member inquiry committee, led by Justice Mukul Mudgal, submitted its findings in a sealed enveloped on February 10. It is believed that the 170-page-report, with annexures running into more than 4000 pages, includes statements of players and officials associated with IPL.

The committee’s report concluded that Gurunath Meiyappan, BCCI president N Srinivasan’s son-in-law, was the de facto owner of the Chennai Super Kings and that he had not only bet on the IPL, but also passed information on the matches to others.

BCCI Raj Kundra, one of the co-owners of the Rajasthan Royals, was also investigated but the committee did not find conclusive evidence that he bet on IPL matches. It did, however, recommend further investigation into the allegations of Kundra.

The BCCI itself appointed a two-member panel, comprising retired judges T Jayaram Chouta and R Balasubramanian, last July to investigate on the alleged claims of widespread corruption in IPL. But the penal had declared that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra, the two who were also probed by the Mudgal committee.

The other two members of the Mudgal committee are additional solicitor general L Nageswara Rao and Assam Cricket Association member Nilay Dutta. It was set up by the Supreme Court in October last year to conduct an independent inquiry into the allegations of corruption against Gurunath and Raj Kundra, as well as betting and spot-fixing in IPL.

Woman alleges child swap at hospital, after given girl says gave birth to boy

A mother who claims she gave birth a boy filed a petition in Patna High Court alleging that the hospital swapped her new-born and asked her to go home with a baby girl instead.

Petitioner Soni Devi had moved HC last year in December claiming her child was swapped with another child at MGM hospital. She claimed she gave birth to a boy in Polo hospital on October 17, 2013.

After birth her child’s condition deteriorated because of which the baby was sent to Chandraprabha Child Care Centre. From there, the child was sent to MGM hospital where he stayed till November 5, she claimed.
However, on the day the baby was to be discharged the doctors gave Soni a girl. When she protested saying the baby girl was not her child, the doctors harassed her and drove her away, the report said.
Following the incident, she along with her husband filed an FIR on 5 November itself.

On Thursday, she produced a birth certificate that was issued to her by Polo hospital in Patna High court. It read that she had in fact given birth to a boy. She also produced a receipt that was given to her by MGM hospital which simply read “Baby of Soni Devi”.

The matter has been now been listed for hearing on March 12.

We are being exploited by our owner

exploited-Vandana-ShahEmployees of Godrej & Boyce company held peaceful demonstrations outside Palladium Mall at Vikhroli in support of their various demands pertaining to salary hike and other benefits. They protested against the exploitation and injustice meted against them by the organization. Staff members were appealing to passers to support them in this endeavor. They informed them about the terrible working conditions prevalent in the company.

One of the employee of Godrej & Boyce spoke to AV on the condition of anonymity and said, “Godrej has been known for providing quality products to the customer at affordable prices. It has won the goodwill of customers through innovation. However the company is not bothered about the employee welfare and is only interested in making profits. The company has made significant progress on account of the efforts of its employees but they are exploiting us.”

They were distributing circular to the pedestrians to support their claim. Employees have mentioned their grievances in the brochure handed over to passersby.

In the leaflet it was printed that Godrej is a 115 year old renowned organization functioning in India. The company is operating in 15 countries and 23 states in India. It is in possession of 3700 acres of land in Vikhroli area in Mumbai. However, the employees working with the organization are denied several benefits by the company.

1. Godrej workers are denied dearness allowance which has been discontinued by the organization.

2. Worker are employed on minimum wages law.

3. The retirement age has been reduced from 60 to 58.

4. The strength of permanent workers of the company is 2900 while 7000 workers are employed on contract basis.

5. Godrej workers do not qualify for even MHADA’s low income group category.

6. The rates at Vikhroli Godrej properties is valued at Rs 13000 sq.ft. However, employees are paid a monthly minimum wages of Rs. 8700 only. They cannot afford to purchase a house in Karjat area

7. The company harasses workers by issuing them legal notices over trivial issues and suspends them.

8. Five workers fighting for their legal rights were dismissed by the company. Twenty eight workers are facing in-house inquiry during 2009 to 2013 period and 205 workers were suspended for 4 days etc.

9. Workers are not paid bonus.

10. Workers are paid minimum wages, but the fees charged by the Godrej school is Rs. 1350.

Employees are afraid to take any legal action against the company as their employment might be terminated by the organization.

Another employee spoke to AV on the condition of anonymity and said, “I appeal to people to come forward and assist us so that justice will be delivered to us.”

Protesting employees had worn Black T-shirt and which contained the message, “Help us to get Justice! Save the workers of Godrej & Boyce”.

When AV tried to contact the management of Godrej & Boyce they remained unavailable for comment.

Vandana Shah

RSS people killed Mahatma Gandhi: Rahul Gandhi

rahul-gandhiCongress Vice-President Rahul Gandhi took on RSS, blaming the outfit for assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. He also ridiculed senior BJP leaders for claiming credit for introducing computers in India.

“RSS people killed Gandhiji and today their people (BJP) talk of him…They opposed Sardar Patel and Gandhiji,” Rahul said while addressing a public rally in Bhiwandi.

The Congress leader attributed technological advancement in the country to late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and technocrat Sam Pitroda.

“When it comes to computers, it was Rajiv Gandhi, Sam Pitroda and other young leaders, (who brought it in India),” Rahul said.

He said, then the most senior opposition leader in Parliament had questioned saying why was Rajiv Gandhi talking about computers.

“They had said India doesn’t need computers as it would snatch away jobs. Look what happened, computers have changed India. After 10 years, the same leaders said it was they who gave computers and telecom to India.”

“Similarly, after five-ten years, they will say NREGA and RTI were their creation,” Rahul said. The Congress Vice President also wondered how it was possible for the opposition (BJP) to do in three months what Congress has done in 60 years.

“The opposition says what Congress has done in 60 years; they will do in three months. How is this possible,” he asked.

Underlining the need to empower women, Rahul said, “there are 50 per cent women in the country but a proportionate number is not seen in state legislature and Parliament.”

The rally was Rahul’s last public function during his two-day Maharashtra tour which began yesterday. Earlier, he had an informal meeting with editors in Mumbai.

Rahul said it was the labour of poor that has taken the country forward and no single individual can take the credit for development.

“Poor people have taken this country forward. If we have to take the country forward, we will have to listen to them and take them together. All, including Adivasis, should reap the fruits of development.

Whatever we (Congress) have done is after factoring in your views,” Rahul told the public meeting. Reiterating that Congress was the party of poor people, he said that Congress was not just an organisation but it is an ideology.

“Congress was born in this State. Our ideology is over 1,000 years old. Our ideology is inspired from Bhagwad Geeta… Shivaji (the Maratha king) used to talk about it. (Samrat) Ashok and (Mahatma) Gandhi had also spoken about it,” the Congress vice-president said.

“Congress has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Our ideology cannot be erased so easily,” he said.

Rahul accused the opposition of playing “divisive” politics in the name of religion. “Wherever the opposition goes they provoke fight between different religions…Hindus with Muslims and Muslims with Hindus…Between different castes and different regions,” he added.

Rahul said his party had always emphasised on “inclusive development” as its growth agenda.

Rahul supports demand for separate fisheries ministry

rahul1213Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi on Thursday met representatives of the fishing community who put forth various demands pertaining to their business like need for a separate ministry, farming status for fisheries and more subsidies on diesel.

In a 40-minute interaction held at Versova fishing village which falls in Mumbai North West parliamentary constituency of CWC member Gurudas Kamat, fishing community representatives highlighted their demands and expressed fear that with land costs in Mumbai spiralling, builders were eyeing sprawling fish markets.

“We want to know on whose side are you?” they asked the Congress leader. “I will always be with you,” Rahul replied adding that he had come to meet them and understand their views and not give a speech.

Supporting the demand for a separate fisheries ministry, he said that it was a good suggestion. When Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan intervened to say that there is budgetary provision of about Rs. 1,600 crore for the animal husbandry ministry, under which the fisheries department falls, one of the locals said all agriculture ministers the state has seen are not from the coastal region and do not understand the nitty gritties of fishing business.

“They have no information of the sea. Like farmers, we do not get compensation, if there is drought (poor cache of fish in the sea),” another speaker pointed out.

There was also a demand for expansion of the Sasoon Docks in South Mumbai. Another local highlighted the need for loans from nationalised banks at low interest rate. “Fishing is not a 12-month business. We need alternative jobs for livelihood,” said one speaker.

Another speaker said in coastal areas, various companies are given permissions in the name of tourism and it has created discomfort among the fisherfolk.

“There has to be a proper policy in favour of the fishing community,” he demanded. Rahul told the gathering that like fishermen even the farmers feel a lot needs to be done for them.

“In the last ten years, the central government has worked to lay a solid foundation for sections of the society so that they feel secure,” he said.

He said the fishing community needs representation in the Legislative Assemblies and Parliament to get their voice heard.

Speed up appointments to Police Complaints Authority: HC

Bombay-HCThe Bombay High Court asked Maharashtra government to expedite the process to fill up vacancies in the Police Complaints Authority, set up at the state and district level, and make it functional.

A division bench of Justices N H Patil and Anuja Prabhudesai was hearing a public interest litigation by one Makarand Mahadik seeking implementation of a 2006 Supreme Court order directing all states to constitute a police complaints authority to redress grievance of citizens about abuse of power by police including that of corruption and negligence.

According to the petition, a government resolution (GR) has also been issued directing for constitution of the authority but no further steps have been taken.

Additional public prosecutor Aruna Kamat-Pai informed the court that on February 1, an ordinance was passed making amendments in the Maharashtra Police Act and setting up of the Police Complaints Authority.

“Appointments to the panel and other steps towards its set up will be done shortly,” she said.

“You (state government) cannot simply say an ordinance has been issued. The main question is when will the authority start functioning? When will you fill up the vacancies and make the panel functional? The state has to take effective steps towards arranging infrastructure and appointing officers and other staff in the authority,” the court said.

The court has posted the petition for hearing after four weeks.

Nawab Malik ridicules Sena-BJP alliance in Maharashtra

The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) took potshots at Maharashtra’s opposition here on Thursday, claiming that “infighting and chaos” prevailed in the ‘grand alliance’ of Shiv Sena, BJP and RPI (Athawale), which had come together purely for power, despite their differing ideologies.

Addressing a press conference, NCP spokesman Nawab Malik said that infighting between the Gadkari and Munde camps is at its peak, while BJP’s ally Shiv Sena calls it a party of traders.

“Munde says he stopped Sharad Pawar from entering the NDA fold, but when he was upset with the BJP, Munde was at the doorstep of 10 Janpath (Sonia Gandhi residence). However, some of his close friends opposed his entry to the Congress,” Malik said.

“The BJP is indeed a party of traders. Even Narendra Modi had insulted defence forces by saying that traders take more risks than soldiers. The BJP has nothing to do with issues of the common man and farmers. We want to ask Uddhav Thackeray that if Shiv Sena feels BJP is a party of traders, then why is he still a BJP ally,” Malik said.

Replying to questions regarding controversies about its Amravati candidate Navneet Kaur Rana’s caste certificate, Malik said that Rana was a former movie actress and is being maligned by her opponents. “She has submitted her caste certificate and is eligible to contest as per rules,” he said.

Can’t imagine Anuhya went with a stranger on bike: Father

Esther-AnuhyaTwo days after the arrest a thief for the murder of software professional Esther Anuhya, an officer from Mumbai Police met her father in Andhra Pradesh and apprised him about the probe.

Anuhya’s father S J S Prasad, however, appeared unconvinced by sequence of events narrated by police after the arrest of Chandrabhan Sanap (28), a history-sheeter who allegedly murdered the 23-year-old techie after attempting to rape her in early January.

A Crime Branch Inspector met Prasad at Machilipatnam in Krishna district this afternoon. During the hour-long meeting, the Inspector gave details about the case and how they zeroed in on Sanap, a taxi driver from Nashik who once worked as a porter in Kurla station from where Anuhya went missing, police said.
Prasad was not convinced by certain claims made by the police, who said Anuhya went with Sanap after he offered to drop her at hostel in suburban Andheri in early hours of January 5 following her arrival from AP by train.

“I still can’t believe my daughter went with an unknown person when he offered to drop her at Andheri for Rs. 300 and that too on a bike. She was very protective about herself,” said Prasad.

He suspected that more than one person might have been involved in the crime.
Anuhya’s decomposed body was found off the Eastern Express Highway in Bhandup on January 16 and Sanap was nabbed a few days ago. Sanap was spotted with Anuhya in a CCTV footage at the Kurla railway terminus.

The 23-year-old was employed as assistant system engineer with IT major TCS in suburban Goregaon.

According to the police, Sanap banged Anuhya’s head to the ground and strangled her with a stole when she tried to resist sexual assault.

Statements of accused in Shakti Mills gangrape case recorded

The sessions court conducting the Shakti Mills photojournalist gangrape case trial, completed recording statements of the accused on Thursday.

The Shakti Mills case pertains to the alleged gangrape of a 22-year-old magazine photojournalist who had gone out on an official assignment with her male colleague, to the deserted Shakti Mills compound in Central Mumbai, on August 22 last year.

“The court has completed recording statements of the four accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC),” said special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam. Under Section 313 of the CrPC, the accused is given a chance to explain the circumstances and allegations against them, through their statements.

The accused, namely Vijay Jadhav, Kasim Bengali, Salim Ansari and Siraj Rehman as well as a minor boy, were charged with rape, conspiracy, common intention, unnatural sex and other sections under the Information Technology Act. On September 19, 2013, the Mumbai police crime branch had filed a 600-page chargesheet against the four accused.

Allegedly, the five accused, (including a juvenile, whose case has been separated) gangraped her at the abandoned Shakti Mills compound, after assaulting her male colleague. Defence advocate Prakash Salsingikar said that the court had asked about 970 questions to the accused.

Meanwhile, Nikam began his final arguments in the related Shakti Mills telephone operator gangrape case and it will continue tomorrow. This case is of an 18-year-old telephone operator also allegedly gangraped by five accused (including three of those who were charged for raping the photojournalist).
On July 31 last year, the police had arrested Mohammed Ashfaq Sheikh, Mohammed Kasim Hafiz Sheikh alias Kasim Bengali, Salim Ansari, Vijay Jadhav and a minor for the alleged gangrape of the telephone operator.

The police had filed a 362-page chargesheet on October 8 last year, against the four accused, in connection with the telephone operator’s gangrape case. Later on, the minor’s case was separated.

HC transfers 2012 case of missing baby to Mumbai Crime Branch

In response to a habeas corpus petition filed by a woman whose one-day-old baby boy went missing from the Wadia Hospital here in 2012, the Bombay High Court transferred the case to Mumbai Crime Branch.

The division bench headed by Justice P V Hardas asked the Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime) to assign the case to a senior officer of the Crime Branch, unit 4.

The case was earlier being probed by Bhoiwada police.

The child went missing from the hospital on October 25, 2012, from the maternity ward when his mother, Jasmin Devdas Naik, was away.

Eye witnesses said that an unknown woman was seen leaving the ward with the boy in her arms.

As the police failed to trace the child, Naik moved the High Court, seeking probe by a senior officer of the crime branch.

Police told the court that despite best efforts, the child as well as the woman remained untraceable.

The High Court observed that this was a serious matter and local police had enough opportunity to find the child, but they failed, hence the court had no other option but to transfer the case to the Crime Branch.