Placeholder canvas
Thursday, November 30, 2023
HomeNation2019 an year of judgements - Supreme Court’s five landmark rulings

2019 an year of judgements – Supreme Court’s five landmark rulings

- Advertisement -

In 2019 the Supreme Court of India delivered many landmark verdicts. Many of these cases were delivered by the then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi’s tenure. Justice Gogoi retired on November 17. But before he vacated the office of the CJI, he had delivered major judgements. The former Chief Justice, Gogoi had taken over as the 46th CJI on October 3, 2018.

1. Ayodhya verdict

Supreme-Court-Ayodhya,ayodhya,cji,ranjan gogoi, supreme courtThe top court ruled that possession of Ayodhya’s contested property will vest in a trust to be formed by the Central government and also directed that representation in the trust may be given to Nirmohi Akhara, a litigant in the case. On November 9, a five-judge constitutional bench headed by CJI Gogoi pronounced its historic verdict on a batch of a petition against the 2010 Allahabad HC order in the politically-sensitive Ramjanmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case. The disputed site was given to the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas and the Centre was asked to build trust for temple construction. The top court also directed allotment of alternative land to Muslims to build a new mosque. A 5-acre land will be handed over to the Sunni Waqf board at a prominent place for building the mosque. This apart, the apex court asked the Centre to frame scheme within 3 months and set up a trust for construction of a temple. The SC dismissed the plea of Nirmohi Akhara seeking control of entire disputed land.

2. Rafale

rafaleOn November 14, the apex court had dismissed a review petition seeking a court-monitored criminal probe into the Rafale fighter jet deal between the government of India and France’s Dassault Aviation. Three -judge bench of the Supreme Court; headed by the then CJI Gogoi had dismissed the review pleas in a unanimous judgment. The review petition was jointly filed by Prashant Bhushan, Arun Shourie and Yashwant Sinha. The apex court had dismissed review petition seeking criminal probe into the Rafale jet deal. The 3-judge bench delivered an unanimous verdict. The development came as a relief for Modi-government

3. Sabarimala

Sabarimala TempleThe top court on November 14 had referred to a larger constitution bench a batch of review petitions against its September 2018 verdict. While reading out the verdict, the then CJI Gogoi has said, “The entry of women into places of worship is not limited to this temple only. It is also involved in the entry of women into mosques.” The bench led by Justice Gogoi had passed the order on a series of petitions seeking reconsideration of its September 2018 judgment that lifted the bar on menstruating women from worshipping in the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. The review petitions in Sabarimala Case is likely to be listed before 7-judge-bench in January 2020.

4. CJI office under RTI

Supreme Court says CJI office under RTI Act, supreme court, rti act, cji officeThe apex court had held that the office of the Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act (RTI).”Transparency doesn’t undermine judicial independence,” SC had said in a unanimous verdict on November 13 as it upheld the Delhi HC’s judgment which ruled that office of the Chief Justice comes under the purview of RTI. It also had dismissed the three appeals filed by the secretary-general of the Supreme Court and the Central Public Information officer of the top court.

5. Contempt case against Rahul Gandhi

Rahul Gandhi, Amethi, Lok sabha elections, lok sabha polls, amethi elections, congress, former congress president, rahul, pappu,The then Chief Justice has also announced the judgement on a criminal contempt plea against Congress Rahul Gandhi for attributing the ‘chowkidar chor hai’ remark to the apex court. The top court had closed the contempt proceedings against Rahul Gandhi after the Congress leader has tendered his ‘unconditional apology’.


Social media and cyber chronology


1. Linking Aadhaar Card with Social Media Profile

aadhaarIn July of 2018, Anthony Clement Rubin filed a PIL in Madras High Court in an attempt to solicit Aadhar Card linkage with social media platforms. The intent behind the PIL (Public Interest Litigation) was to demand conversion of encrypted data into simpler language, promoting traceability of malicious actors who are involved in/benefit from spreading incomplete, falsified information online. Linking Aadhaar Card would greatly aid in tracking the offenders.

Facebook-owned Whatsapp would be the most to lose on this one. This messaging platform has resisted prior attempts by governmental agencies throughout the world who wanted access into Whatsapp’s databases to monitor the cyber-space for offences or wanted this feature (encrypted messaging) to be removed entirely. India is home to 400 million Whatsapp users, therefore, accountability should mean security – not entirely true. It can lead to a compromise in the security of all Indian users as their personal/private information will be made public; foreign governments and institutions gain easy, unrestricted access. Facebook filed for a transfer to the Supreme Court whose verdict rescued them. The Supreme Court said that linking social media accounts with Aadhaar Card would be a breach of privacy policies, Facebook readily agrees.

Madras High Court, which supported the PIL, said: “The linking of social media profiles of the users with the Aadhaar was needed to check fake news, defamatory articles, pornographic materials, anti-national and terror contents in the online media.”

2. Proxy Wars

India has been shaping public opinion abroad through the use of proxy websites. They usually push forwards the narratives of the Indian Government. These websites, according to EU Disinfo Lab (Brussel-based NGO), are in operation in over 65 countries and under fake news titles or titles of old newspapers or publications which have long been out of commission. The content on these websites usually focuses on the minorities in Pakistan or on the Kashmir issue or on other issues along the same lines, mostly harming Pakistan unjustly. For instance, the ‘About Us’ (pertaining to the information about the website and their team members, etc.) section of Manchester Times is a replica of a Wikipedia entry for a newspaper with the same name (Manchester Times) which closed its door in 1922. Disinfo Lab’s findings established a connection between these fraudulent websites to Indian stakeholders, companies, networks, etc. mainly linked with Srivastava Group. The Indian Institute for Non-Allied Studies (IINS) and the New Delhi Times share the same IP address and can be linked back to the Srivastava Group. This ambiguous connection (should) peak curiosity, when visits for 27 officials from the EU is organised by the IINS after the incidents that took place in Kashmir. Indian agencies are engaged in lobbying efforts throughout Europe, influencing leaders and public opinions alike. A clear connection between these websites and the Indian government has not been established

3. Free movie downloaders, streamers, Star Wars fans beware!

According to Kaspersky, 30 websites and social media handles, claiming to be the official movie accounts of the latest Star Wars movie, are in fact mediums/vehicle for cybercriminals to infect systems with malware. People fall victim to ‘clickbait’ and in the process unknowingly download spyware that extracts user information. It comes highly recommended not opening accounts or entering personal details (credit/credit card details, name, address, phone number, etc.) on these websites because that is how the cyber-criminals steal data. Be wary of any and all websites that offer free downloads as they play host to these parasites. Efforts are made to empower the ‘Rebel Faction’ and send disruptive waves across the Star Wars community, which is huge and consists of people from all age groups.

4. Fears over Facial Recognition in China

Face Recognition in ChinaAccording to a Chinese report and reported by Abacus, found that almost 80% of the population fears facial data leaks, 65% are fearful of ‘Deepfake’ and many more are afraid of cyber theft and fraud. Digital data is left unprotected or loosely guarded as the country (China) faces data theft quiet often. A local media reported the sale of 5,000 images of people for as low as $2 per image. Still, 44% or less feel the need for technological intervention but at the same time, 88% prefer to have more control over their facial data.

China is digitising rapidly, payment companies prefer people using the facial recognition feature while making any sorts of payments like paying for subway tickets, groceries, etc. Chinese dating companies also encourage the use of facial recognition to avoid relaying misinformation. Some bathroom stalls even have facial recognition systems implemented, to monitor/prevent people from using excessive toilet paper.

The government and other agencies have access to this data and there have been reported cases of misuse. Invasion of privacy is rampant except in one area – voting, as the country is yet to implement biometrics for the election/voting is state-controlled.

5. India and Japan to work together on Space and Cyber Security programmes

Prime Minister, after the success of Mission Shakti, where a DRDO missile launched off the coast of Odisha successfully hit a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite, announced that India could now take down satellites in space. The US, China and Russia are the only other countries apart from India that is ASAT (Anti-Satellite Weapons tests) proficient. Though India possesses ASAT capabilities, Japan has a well-established and extensive space programme. External Affairs Minister S Jaisahankar and Taro Kono (minister from Japan of similar designation) met during the G20 (outside the meetings) to discuss further on Space and CyberSecurity collaboration. Japan’s primary objective is to keep pace with developments in China for which it has offered to enter into a joint venture with India on connectivity projects, infrastructural developmental projects in the North East and other projects in countries like Bhutan, Myanmar, Kenya and Bangladesh. The two ministers entered into further talks regarding cybersecurity and other related issues. The two countries together hope to work towards building better Indo-pacific relations and fostering peace in Asian countries.

6. Juice Jacking

An alternate meaning of the word ‘Juice’ is used to refer to anyone who has power, influence, authority or sexual desirability. ‘Juice’ in this context means electric power. People who use charging ports or USB inlets at the airport or other public area are at risk of having their data stolen. The ports are infected with malware which allows hackers to infiltrate devices without anyone knowing and are able to extract personal/sensitive data including passwords and bank details; the hackers can also bar the person, to whom the device belongs to, from accessing it. It was observed that people disregard safety when their devices are about to run out of the said ‘juice’, plugging devices to any charging port available. Hackers lie in anticipation of such people, hackers replace the harmless charging ports with their personal malware-infested gadgets. “What they do is a very simple trick” and “They essentially disable the data pin on the USB charger”, said Prof Sekar of Carnegie Mellon University. Be mindful that this type of hacking is fairly complicated and very difficult to execute. People are advised to carry their own power bank, carry ac chargers and use ac power outlets.

7. High Profile Acquisitions

There were several big-money moves made in the Cyber Security sphere in 2019. Insight Partners, an equity company, purchased a controlling stake in an internet technology company which specialises in simpler data generation to aid a thorough understanding of external cyber threats. Few customers of Recorded Future are The Gap, Verison, Morgon Stanley, etc.

Sophos, British hardware and software company, announced that Thoma Bravo, another equity firm, offered $3.9 billion to purchase the company. Thoma Bravo is of the opinion that Sophos is – “a global leader in next-generation cyber security solutions spanning endpoint, next-generation firewall, cloud security, server security, managed threat response, and more.” Tech Crunch journalist, Zack Whittaker reported the presence of a vulnerability in Sophos’ system allowing hackers to enter its “internal networks without needing a password.” Sophos is spread across 150 countries with over 100 million users and 400,000 customers.

Palo Alto, the world foremost authority in Cyber Security, announced the purchase of Demisto, in cash and equity, for $560 million. Demisto is another leading Cyber Security company which specialise in Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR). CEO of Palo Alto Networks, Nikesh Arora said – “With the combination of Demisto and our existing threat prevention and response capabilities, we will be well-positioned to unlock the biggest challenges facing teams in security operations centres today,” and “…the integration of Demisto into Cortex will bring stronger automation and artificial intelligence capabilities to our platform, delivering greater protection across all environments.”FireEye, which discovered data theft of 68 million patients and doctor from an India-based company, paid $250 million to acquire Verodin. FireEye hopes that this acquisition will better the overall efficiency and security services that the company provides by adapting to the changes in the IT landscape and fixing the vulnerabilities within the system.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


Must Read

- Advertisement -

Related News