Placeholder canvas
Tuesday, October 3, 2023
HomeTop NewsBombay HC discharges Anilkumar Gaikwad in charges of graft

Bombay HC discharges Anilkumar Gaikwad in charges of graft

- Advertisement -

Anilkumar-Gaikwad, PWD, Gaikwad, Irrigation Scam, High Court, Bombay High Court, Bombay HC, Scam, Irrigation, Anil Kumar Gaikwad, Ajit Pawar, Chhagan BhujbalThe anti-corruption bureau (ACB) had booked Anilkumar Gaikwad along with the partners of FA Enterprises, Fateh Mohammed Khatri, and his sons Nisar, Jaitun, Aabid, and Jahid, on September 23, 2015, on charges of graft. Justice AM Badar, however, overruled the special court order on the ground of lack of evidence against Anilkumar Gaikwad.

When asked Gaikwad told Afternoon Voice, “I have immense faith in judiciary and court of law, the five years wait was painful to live with allegations. But finally, justice prevailed.” “I always believed that I will come clean.”

The Bombay high court on Tuesday discharged Anilkumar Gaikwad, the then executive engineer of the Presidency division of the public works department (PWD), from a case related to an irrigation scam in Maharashtra’s Konkan region. Gaikwad was accused of overlooking the rules and forwarding a proposal for registration of FA Enterprises as a Class-1A contractor with the government. He allegedly forwarded the proposals without conducting proper scrutiny of documents submitted by the contractor.

Gaikwad moved HC after the special ACB court rejected his discharge plea on March 15, 2019.The judge also took into consideration a government resolution (GR) issued by the PWD authorities on November 28, 2018, that exempted all their employees from penal consequences arising out of the scrutiny of documents submitted by contractors. The judge noted that the GR stated that PWD employees or officers who may be entrusted with the work of scrutiny of documents submitted by contractors to the department shall not be held responsible for penal consequences in respect of scrutiny of such documents, if those turn out to be false and fabricated.

“As this GR has the retrospective effect, the continuation of prosecution against the applicant (Gaikwad), which is an allegation that he has not ascertained veracity and truthfulness of the documents submitted by the FA Enterprises, would certainly amount to an abuse of the process of the court,” said Justice Badar.

The judge noted that there was hardly any evidence against the PWD engineer Anilkumar Gaikwad.

“Perusal of the entire charge-sheet does not reveal iota of evidence for even prima facie demonstration of an offence of criminal misconduct on the part of the applicant,” said the court. It noted that the entire file relating to the registration and certification of FA Enterprises as a Class-1A government contractor has gone missing. No original document is available to shed light on the registration of FA Enterprises as a Class-1A government contractor, it added.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


Must Read

- Advertisement -

Related News