A good monsoon can help add “a percentage point” to India’s GDP growth in the current fiscal, from 7.6% in 2015-16, NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Arvind Panagariya said today expressing confidence in crossing the 8% mark.
“I am very optimistic particularly encouraged by the monsoon. Monsoon will deliver this time. We can expect some pretty robust agriculture growth,” Panagariya told reporters on the sidelines of a conference of chief secretaries and planning secretaries here.
“If the agriculture growth does pan out on those lines…That adds up a percentage point to the growth. That really makes crossing 8% quite probable. We should cross 8% in 2016-17,” he added.
Indian economy grew 7.9% in March quarter and recorded a five-year high growth rate of 7.6% for the 2015-16 fiscal on robust manufacturing growth.
Enthused by the impressive numbers for the last fiscal, as against 7.2% in 2014-15, the government had also said that the growth rate can go up to 8% in the current fiscal on the back of a good monsoon.
The farm sector also rebounded to the growth zone, as against a contraction in previous fiscal, although the rate of expansion was low at 1.2% in 2015-16.
About Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to NITI Aayog tomorrow, he said: “We will be discussing with the Prime Minister precisely the Vision (15 years till 2030), Strategy (7 Years) and Action Plan (3 years) documents. We will seek his guidance on these documents and share our views.”
On states continuing with five-year plan system which was abolished by the Centre, he said the government is not imposing anything on states. Some states will continue with their plans.
“As you know, the Planning Commission was replaced by the NITI Aayog, in most of the states Planning Boards are continuing.
“There are certain things which require aligning, for example the distinction between the Plan and Non-Plan expenditure. This will disappear starting 2017-18. But states that keep the planning (old process), they will then be free to choose what expenditure they want to classify as Plan expenditure at state levels,” he added.