Aam Aadmi Party State Convenor Anjali Damania who was initially supposed to contest the Lok Sabha election against BJP leader Nitin won’t be contesting the election. She would be playing the role of star campaigner for AAP party in the general election. Damania had alleged irregularities in the affairs of Gadkari’s Purti Group last year. Mayank Gandhi, Maharashtra President of Aam Aadmi Party confirmed that Anjali won’t be contesting election and would work for strengthening the party at grass roots level.
Talking to AV, Mayank Gandhi said, “I and Anjali Damania will be working for the development of the party in Maharashtra. If both of us contest election then we won’t be able to provide guidance to party workers. Hence Anjali will campaign aggressively for the party.”
When we spoke to Anjali Damania, she said, “If I will contest the election then I can’t focus on the work of party’s development. Therefore, I won’t contest election and instead would provide guidance to party workers keeping in mind the upcoming election.”
When asked Mayank Gandhi whether Anjali is not contesting election as she wants to avoid a faceoff with Nitin Gadkari he said, “It’s not true. AAP will field strong candidate against Nitin Gadkari who can give him a tough fight in the election.”
Even though Anjali might be campaigning for the party many leaders want her to contest election against Nitin Gadkari and defeat him. Maharashtra is a key state for the Aam Aadmi Party, not only because this is the birthplace of the India Against Corruption movement to which most senior AAP members of Maharashtra belong, but also because IAC and AAP members have built a large support base here.
AAP Maharashtra spokesperson and State Secretary, Preeti Sharma Menon said, “Anjali Damania is one of the strong contenders to contest the upcoming Lok Sabha election. She instead decided to not contest election and make strategies for the party’s expansion. I am pleased with Anjali’s decision to refrain from contesting election as she is working for the development of the party which needs to be appreciated.”
BJP state president Devendra Fadnavis said, “It is the personal decision of Anjali Damania to not contest the upcoming Lok Sabha election.”
Mayank Gandhi is likely to contest against Gurudas Kamat, Member of Parliament, Mumbai North West and AICC General Secretary and CWC member. Former CEO of Royal Bank of Scotland Meera Sanyal will be contesting against Milind Deora from South Mumbai.
Senior BJP leader Gopinath Munde on Monday sought to know why Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar decided not to contest the Lok Sabha polls this time, when the UPA was facing difficult times.
“Pawar took a decision to contest the Rajya Sabha polls instead of working with Congress when the UPA is in difficult situation,” said Munde.
“When Rahul Gandhi has taken up a bigger role in Congress, Pawar should remain part of UPA and work with party president Sonia Gandhi. However, he has gone to Rajya Sabha. The NCP leader should explain why he has taken this decision,” Deputy Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha said.
“We have prepared a charge-sheet called the ‘Dark Decade of UPA’, in which we have listed UPA’s performance in last ten years. Inflation, corruption are the main issue we have mentioned in the charge-sheet,” he said.
Munde also targeted Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar for declaring load-shedding free Maharashtra earlier. “Why did Pawar make false claims when loadshedding still exists in Beed and some other parts of Maharashtra,” he said.
The BJP leader announced that RPI will be made a member of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA).
On February 16, a rally of “mahayuti” (mega alliance of Shiv Sena-BJP-RPI) has been organised in Beed.
Shiv-Sena president Uddhav Thackeray, MP Ramdas Athawale, MLA Raju Shetti, BJP Maharashtra unit chief Devendra Fadanvis will be present.
The Supreme Court asked the Campa Cola Residents Association and the civic body in Mumbai to find out within four weeks a solution to the row over certain illegal and unauthorised flats which face demolition in view of its earlier order.
“The Attorney General is asked to sort out the matter. It is better to try to sort out the issue within four weeks,” a bench of justices S J Mukhopadhya and Kurian Joseph said.
The court’s remarks came when senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the residents body, said the proposal, which may include a plea for either regularisation of illegal construction or relocating flat owners, was being finalised and would be submitted to Attorney General G E Vahanvati within two weeks.
It said the AG would consider the proposal and decide within four weeks. Referring to earlier proceedings, the bench said the main matter had already been decided and moreover, “the review petition against the judgement has also been dismissed”.
“So far as the government is concerned, it can do anything. We do not want to say anything.” it said.
Earlier, the apex court had asked the unauthorised flats owners to vacate the premises by May 31 as no specific proposal could be worked out to provide them space in the compound for new construction.
The order was passed after Vahanvati said, “After considering all aspects we are not in a position to work out any specific proposal.”
The bench, which stayed the demolition of the unauthorised flats by taking cognisance of media reports, had said that it took the humanitarian ground into consideration to extend the date of demolition from November 11, 2013 to May 31, 2014 as the Attorney General had sought time to come out with a specific proposal for permanent solution.
It had asked the municipal corporation to take action in accordance with its February 27, 2013 order after the May 31, 2014 deadline ends.
The court on February 27 had ordered the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to demolish the illegally constructed flats and on October 1 refused to re-consider its earlier order and had set November 11 deadline to vacate 102 flats which were declared as illegal.
After Congress MPs Sanjay Nirupam and Priya Dutt, another party MP from Mumbai, Gurudas Kamat has approached Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan, seeking relief for power consumers.
Kamat has written a letter to Chavan and Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) asking them to leave it to the consumers to decide their power providers.
The MP from Mumbai North-West constituency has demanded that consumers be provided “Open Access”, whereby they have the choice of selecting electricity provider.
To address the anxiety and concern of the citizens of Mumbai over regular hikes in electricity rates by private electricity providers, the Electricity Act of 2003 permits the “open access” thereby giving a choice to the consumer to select any provider offering better services or rates, he said.
“This choice should be made available to all Mumbai citizens,” Kamat said.
He said Tata Electric Company’s rates are nearly Rs. 2 per unit less than the other company in the market, for consumption up to 300 units. Consumers whose electricity consumption is upto 300 units may be allowed to switch to Tata Electric Company.
The Tata company may be directed to provide the services to the people of Mumbai wanting a change, Kamat said.
Around 20 lakh households could benefit by this shift, he said. Benefits of other subsidies and withdrawal of taxes may also be considered by the state government, or MERC, he added.
The Bombay High Court ruled that proposal for redevelopment of any building falling under a proposed heritage precinct but not individually listed as Grade I and II heritage structure, need not be referred to the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC) and can be decided by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC).
The ruling was made by a division bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice M S Sanklecha while hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the August 14, 2013 circular issued by the civic body directing all its officers to refer proposals for redevelopment of any building that falls in the proposed list of heritage precincts, to the MHCC.
On July 31, 2012 the corporation had come up with a proposed list of 41 sites to be declared as heritage precincts. The sites included Shivaji Park and Matunga in Central Mumbai and suburb of Chembur. The list was issued after a recommendation from the MHCC in 2008.
The petitions filed by Arun Chitale, a resident of Shivaji Park, Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and residents of Matunga and Chembur challenged the BMC circular stating that under Development Control Regulation (DCR) 67(2)(iii)(b) if the building does not fall under Grade I and II then the redevelopment plea need not be referred to the MHCC.
According to the petitions, the BMC can decide the proposals and special permission was required from the municipal commissioner if the building exceeded 24 meters in height.
Advocate General Darius Khambata agreed with the petitioners and said, “To say all the buildings are heritage Grade I and II is a little over ambitious. The MHCC should review its recommendation,” he said.
“After hearing the petitioners, we are of the view that the petitions are justified in making grievance against the BMC circular dated August 14, 2013. Under DCR 67(2)(iii)(b) there is no need to refer to MHCC proposals of those buildings which have not been listed as Grade I and II heritage structures,” the court said.
The Maharashtra government has transferred 17 IAS officers, including senior bureaucrat Sanjay Deshmukh who is currently the collector of suburban Mumbai, to various other posts.
Deshmukh has been transfered to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation as its Additional Municipal Commissioner.
Other senior IAS officers who have been transferred include Anup Kumar, who was on central deputation as the Divisional Commissioner of Nagpur.
Rubbishing rumours about plans to go with the BJP during the forthcoming Lok Sabha polls, the Sharad Pawar-led Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) said that it would strive to stop communal forces in Maharashtra.
Talking to reporters after a meeting of Maharashtra’s NCP leaders to chalk out an election strategy, NCP working president Jitendra Awhad said, “We are going to stand against communal forces.”
Calling themselves “die-hard” secularists, he said that the NCP would not do anything that would support those with an extremist and fascist outlook.
“We are die-hard secularists. We believe in secularism and will go with secular parties. We will not support communal forces in any way. We will not do anything that will favour people who believe in a fascist ideology,” he said.
The NCP MLA said that his party chief and Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar has clarified that the NCP would stand against communal forces during the elections.
“We will not compromise under any circumstances with the BJP,” he said.
“We are with the Congress and will remain with them. Our alliance is on the basis of similar ideology,” Awhad said.
To speed up delayed projects, states should set up project-monitoring-groups, as in the Prime Minister’s Office, a senior government official said today.
Nine states – Rajasthan, Bihar, Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Bengal — are currently in the process of setting up project-monitoring-groups (PMG).
“Some states have already done it, while others are in the process of getting necessary training for setting up PMGs. We expect all these PMGs will be operational in the next 15-20 days,” PMO’s PMG head Anil Swarup said.
These groups would mostly take up projects worth less than Rs 1,000 crore. “If more states come forward to set up such PMGs, many projects worth less than Rs 1000-crore, which are stuck due to several issues, can be cleared and investments can flow in the states,” he said. The PMG at the PMO has identified 419 stalled projects, worth almost Rs 20 lakh crore, that had been pending for years. Of these, problems for 137 projects worth Rs 4.5 lakh crore have been resolved in the past seven months since the Cabinet Committee on Investment (CCI) started functioning.
“Out of these 137 projects, issues pertaining to 84, totalling Rs 3.71 trillion investments, have been sorted out completely and work on them is progressing,” Swarup said.
He said projects related to coal mining and power formed the biggest chunk of the stalled projects, followed by those stuck over forest and environmental clearances. “Some 70,000 MW-worth coal related projects have been cleared by the PMG. Besides, some major road projects have also been cleared,” he added.
A day after Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray criticised the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi for ignoring his uncle and Shiv Sena founder late Bal Thackeray, the party has hit back claiming he has no right to talk about the leader.
Addressing a convention of senior citizens in Mumbai, Mr. Thackeray on Sunday criticised Mr. Modi for second time in a month. “Why did he not even mention Balasaheb’s name in his speech in Mumbai? This is despite both the parties being allies for so many years,” said Mr. Thackeray.
He went on to attack Mr. Modi for calling Mumbai ‘a maternal home of Gujaratis.’ “So what is Mumbai for Maharashtrians? He is just unnecessarily bringing up the issue of Samyukta Maharashtra movement,” he added.
The Samyukta Maharashtra movement in late 50s was responsible for inclusion of Mumbai (then known as Bombay) in Maharashtra and not in Gujarat.
Shiv Sena’s ally BJP has reacted strongly on MNS chief’s comments. “He is a person who was the reason of biggest pain Balasaheb suffered in his lifetime, by splitting the party. What right does he have to talk about Sena chief’s honour?” asked Devendra Fadnavis, President, BJP’s state unit.
He added that, Mr. Thackeray has lost his charisma to attract voters due to Mr. Modi’s wave of popularity. “He is using Mr. Modi’s name to keep his voters intact. But his tactics won’t work this time,” Mr. Fadnavis said.
Last month, the MNS chief had asked Mr. Modi to have a national outlook instead of harping on Gujarat’s success, as he is aiming to be the prime minister of the country.
We entered in the 68th year of Independence but we Indians are still unable to adapt the very first Article of our constitution which says “Bharat as a Union of states” and the principles of preamble (equality, fraternity etc). Racist, harsh and discriminatory attitude towards the dressing, physical features, complexion is rampant in our society. Is this the “future” that our forefathers thought of? We are progressing superficially but nothing has changed much. Still, Dalits are discriminated in some parts of India. They are not allowed to enter in kitchen or temples. There is no social acceptance for down-trodden people. On the other side, if we see in metropolitan cities then Dalit youth wants reservations, but they do not accept merits. They are seeking every advantage from jobs to studies, but they do not want to come in main stream competition. We call this nation as an independent country but we lack in mental growth and human progress. I am terribly upset with so called ‘Dalit leaders’ and autocrats, they never bothered about their community. They just play politics on community’s name. If Mayawati, Ramvilas Paswan and Ramdas Athawale who claim themselves as Dalit leaders inspite of self growth they had concentrated on community’s prosperity the way Baba Saheb wanted then today this community would have been more liberated and prospered.
Even the most tolerant person can never achieve open minded thought because, in a cognitive sense, each new experience must be amalgamated with the previous before it can be processed. Based on what has been learned about prejudice so far, human beings have a great deal to learn about each other before prejudice can be reduced. Even in the earliest civilizations, people felt that guilt and misfortune could be shifted from one man to another, known in modern times as projection. Discrimination helps to boost the self-esteem. One guaranteed way to maintain high self-esteem is by having someone to look down on. Stereotyped characteristics are, in some cases, a displacement of personality traits which are undesirable. Guilt, fear, anger, anxiety and greed are some of the most prominent, but not the only emotions for which prejudice serves a functional significance.
The cognitive, social and humanistic perspectives rely heavily on each other to provide a full explanation of prejudice. Woman’s plight is even more pathetic, verbal abuse as well as accusing them of illegal and immoral trade exposed the mindset of our Nation. Only people who have experienced the horror and the brutalising effects of the caste system will understand what it means to be a Dalit in Indian society. A Dalit is considered to be untouchable, invisible, and unapproachable and even, in a way, unthinkable.
Dalits have been suffering, humiliated, martyr from the last two thousand years. Does the world know about this man-made tragedy? Even though untouchability was officially abolished by law in the 1950’s in India, the Dalits still experience the agony of untouchability very deeply in all walks of life: social, economic and political. For Dalit children, the future does not look much better. Fifteen million children are bonded labourers, working in slave-like conditions, and the majority of them are Dalits. Thousands of girls are forced into prostitution even before reaching the age of puberty. Devadasis, literally meaning “female servants of god,” usually belong to the Dalit community. These girls are pretty and have caught the fancy of a higher caste man. Once dedicated as a devadasi, the girl can become the playmate of such a man. Afterwards, she is cast aside and auctioned off to an urban brothel. As a devadasi, she is unable to marry forever.
Dalit women also suffer another form of abuse. They are often raped as a form of retaliation. Sexual abuse and other forms of violence against women are used by landowners to inflict political “lessons”, and crush dissent within the Dalit community. It’s really shameful for all of us that such activities are taking place in our country. After independence everybody was scared that how a country like India can remain united out of it diversity in all walks of life i.e. caste, tribe, religion etc. No religion or nation preaches intolerance or endorses the view to look down upon anyone. If we feel that looking down on someone who is not from our background is justified and flaunts our nationalistic attitude, then we must realize that it is time we review our understanding. A prejudice is a belief about a group of people based on their religion, ethnicity, race, gender, handicap or any other factors. It can be positive or negative, but as a prejudice involves passing judgement on a large group of people regardless of their individual qualities, it is considered to be unfair. Prejudice which causes unfair treatment is called discrimination, and in many cases discrimination can be illegal. Prejudices and discrimination can result in serious problems for both the people that hold them and the people that they are prejudiced against. Most of the people who discriminate against a group do so because of upbringing or societal reasons. However, some prejudices are due to a bad experience with a certain person or a traumatic life event that has caused an individual to stereotype an entire group. Many prejudices develop from fears or misunderstanding of a certain culture or race.
Conflict of interest in job and education are very unfortunate. It may start trust deficit among the Indian. Are we becoming a nation of bigoted folks? By committing hate crimes against the people of the north eastern states, we are sowing the seeds of dissension. If the police don’t apprehend the culprits and bring them to justice, we are putting our pluralistic structure of our country, of which we are so proud, in real danger.