The political landscape in Maharashtra is witnessing intense deliberations over the next Chief Minister (CM) following the Mahayuti Alliance’s emphatic victory in the assembly elections. Securing 233 out of 288 seats, the alliance—which includes the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Ajit Pawar’s faction of the NCP, and Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena—delivered a crushing blow to the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA). However, the BJP’s dominant performance, with 132 seats, has fueled speculation that the party may prefer its own leader, Devendra Fadnavis, over the incumbent CM, Eknath Shinde, for the top post.
The BJP’s silence on the CM issue has not gone unnoticed, with growing pressure from its MLAs to install a party leader in the state’s highest office. Fadnavis, the current Deputy CM, has emerged as the frontrunner, with many MLAs openly advocating for his elevation. Known for his administrative skills and transformative policies during his previous tenure as CM (2014–2019), Fadnavis is seen as the architect of BJP’s record-breaking win in these elections. His return as CM would signal a shift in governance style, aligning Maharashtra more closely with the BJP’s national agenda of development and efficiency.
The BJP’s reluctance to continue under Shinde’s leadership stems from a combination of strategic and practical concerns. While the Mahayuti fought the elections under Shinde’s leadership and delivered a historic mandate, BJP leaders argue that their substantial majority should translate into control of the CM’s office. Many within the party feel that after playing second fiddle for 2.5 years as Deputy CM, Fadnavis deserves to reclaim the top position.
Shinde, however, is reportedly unwilling to relinquish the CM’s chair. His reluctance is rooted in his belief that his leadership remains vital for the alliance’s performance in upcoming local body elections, including the crucial Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) polls. Shinde’s appeal among urban and Marathi voters, coupled with his grassroots connections, could be pivotal in consolidating the alliance’s grip on state politics. His supporters argue that replacing him might disrupt the Mahayuti’s momentum and alienate a significant voter base.
Shinde’s tenure as CM has been marked by his ability to connect with the populace, particularly in urban and semi-urban areas. His leadership style emphasizes regional pride and grassroots development, qualities that resonate with a significant segment of Maharashtra’s electorate. For these reasons, Shinde’s camp has been lobbying hard to ensure his continuation as CM, viewing it as a strategic move for long-term political gains.
Within BJP circles, the debate over the CM post has become increasingly intense. On one hand, the party recognizes Shinde’s value as a leader who has proven his ability to mobilize voters and secure victories. On the other hand, there is a strong push for Fadnavis, whose governance track record and political astuteness could bring a fresh, dynamic approach to state administration. Several rounds of discussions, including high-level meetings among BJP’s central leadership, have reportedly taken place, but a consensus remains elusive.
The BJP is also mindful of the optics of replacing Shinde, especially given his role in steering the Mahayuti to a landslide victory. Any decision to oust him could be perceived as undermining the alliance’s collective mandate. However, the scale of BJP’s performance in the elections has emboldened party leaders, who see an opportunity to assert their dominance and install Fadnavis as CM. Ultimately, the decision on the CM will rest with the BJP’s central leadership and its parliamentary board. The party is likely to consult alliance partners, including the NCP and Shiv Sena factions, to ensure a smooth transition and avoid internal rifts. Given the stakes involved, the leadership is expected to weigh the political and electoral implications of its choice carefully.
Shinde’s reluctance to step down also stems from a strategic argument: continuity in leadership, he contends, is crucial for maintaining the alliance’s electoral momentum. By remaining CM, Shinde believes he can strengthen the Mahayuti’s position in local body elections, particularly in Mumbai, where the BMC elections hold significant political and financial stakes. His supporters argue that his grassroots appeal and regional pride could translate into a clean sweep for the alliance in these polls. However, this perspective contrasts sharply with the BJP’s broader political vision. The party sees Fadnavis as a leader who can realign state politics with its national narrative, emphasizing development, economic reforms, and infrastructure growth. Fadnavis’s administrative acumen and governance style, which appealed to urban and middle-class voters during his previous tenure, are seen as assets that could further bolster the BJP’s position in Maharashtra.
The current power struggle harks back to the political turmoil that followed the 2019 assembly elections. Despite winning a majority in alliance with the undivided Shiv Sena, the BJP was unable to form a government as the Shiv Sena broke away to join the MVA, led by Uddhav Thackeray. This led to a series of dramatic political developments, including the eventual formation of the Mahayuti Alliance under Shinde’s leadership in 2022. Over the past five years, Maharashtra has seen three different CMs: Fadnavis, Thackeray, and Shinde.
The BJP’s central leadership is keen to avoid a repeat of this instability and is focused on ensuring a seamless transition, whether it involves retaining Shinde or reinstating Fadnavis as CM. The tenure of the current Maharashtra assembly ends on Tuesday, adding urgency to the decision-making process. Meanwhile, all 57 Shiv Sena MLAs have been summoned to a meeting in Bandra to elect the legislature party leader. Sources suggest that Shinde may submit his resignation to the governor and continue as caretaker CM until the new government is sworn in.
While Shinde’s supporters remain optimistic about his continuation, indications from BJP circles point to a strong preference for Fadnavis. The saffron party’s leadership appears determined not to delay Fadnavis’s return to Varsha, the CM’s official residence in Mumbai.
The choice between Shinde and Fadnavis is more than a mere leadership tussle; it represents a broader battle for control over the Mahayuti’s political narrative. Shinde’s leadership symbolizes regional pride and grassroots politics, while Fadnavis embodies a governance model centered on development and alignment with BJP’s national strategy. The decision will have far-reaching implications, not only for Maharashtra’s governance but also for the BJP’s prospects in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.
As the BJP navigates this delicate balancing act, it must consider the impact of its decision on the alliance’s unity, voter sentiment, and its own long-term political objectives. Whether it chooses continuity with Shinde or a fresh start with Fadnavis, the outcome will shape Maharashtra’s political landscape for years to come.
