Home Blog Page 922

Why should teaching be restricted to classrooms?

childrenIndian Teachers,students, private schools, government schoolsToday’s teachers are feeling the heat and resentment, as they face many challenges in this profession. The foremost seems to be the discrepancy in the salary of private and government school teachers. While it is good that the government teachers are getting their due, private school teachers are overburdened with work and still do not get paid accordingly. The slightest lucrative opportunity elsewhere makes a teacher manipulative hoping to grab it. This results in high attrition rate and even the sense of belongings to an institution suffers a setback.

Our education system, which is designed around narrow and outdated exams, seems to be pushing teachers and students to forget about thinking and focus only on rote learning from a textbook. Well-meaning and hardworking teachers across the country spend countless hours covering portions, preparing kids for exams, and teaching them to score well. And anxious children across the country spend a lot of time memorising information, hoping that they will be able to provide the answer that the examiner is looking for.

The students are getting bored sitting in a classroom atmosphere and would like to learn more from outside.  Even teaching children in an open space is an available option as the students would like to share the new experience of education sitting on the lawns of the school. But there are restrictions that children should be confined to four walls and glue to the black board or watch at the power point presentation all the time. This makes children more monotonous and when a class picnic or an educational tour is arranged the children consider it as a learning curve and make use of the opportunity in the best way possible.

Different options are tried out with different type of children. An educative lot is given a special training for improving their prospects in scoring high marks. Again, for differently-abled children we need to tap their talent and apply our mind to give them the much need boost. For example, these students can be trained in physical activities and with multi sports options they bring out the best in them on and off the field.  It’s a good initiative if an inter-school competition is being held for these special kids with special needs. Such programmes are hardly conducted.

Autism is no longer classified as a single disorder, but rather an entire spectrum ranging in severity. It is the core of all of these syndromes, with its features being prevalent to varying degrees throughout, and includes disorders such as Rett Syndrome and Childhood dis-integrative disorder. Aarti Vatsala, an Indian working for 5 years in Kuwait and Gurugram in international schools after doing her MA in psychology feel at ease in dealing with children by taking them out.

Let’s get our teachers thinking about some fundamental questions: Why do we teach? What is the purpose of school? And what is it that we are trying to do every day in our classrooms? What does a child in the 21st century need to learn? How do we make sure that our students are thinking and learning? And why our students are not being praised and commended when they ask good questions in classes? Why isn’t thinking being valued and encouraged in our classrooms?

Let’s make sure that we do two central things. First, encourage our teachers to ask open-ended questions that stimulate thinking. And second, encourage our teachers to validate students who ask interesting questions. Then maybe we will begin to see some thinking in our classrooms.


(The views expressed by the author in the article are his/her own.)

Help Parallel Media, Support Journalism, Free Press, Afternoon Voice

Mallikarjun Kharge will convey views of Maharashtra Cong MLAs to party leadership: Manikrao Thakare

kharge
File Pic

Amid political uncertainty in Maharashtra, senior Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge on Sunday met the party’s newly elected MLAs, who are currently staying at a resort in Jaipur, to discuss the political situation in the state.

Kharge, who is the All India Congress Committee‘s (AICC) generally secretary, met the legislators informally to ascertain their views on what stand the party should take about government formation in Maharashtra, senior congress leader Manikrao Thakare told agencies.

“Kharge will then convey the sentiments of the legislators to the party leadership,” Thakare said.

All 44 MLAs, including senior leaders like Ashok Chavan, Prithviraj Chavan and Balasaheb Thorat, were staying at the resort in the Congress-ruled Rajasthan amid fear of “poaching” in view of the stalemate over government formation in Maharashtra.

The BJP and its ally Shiv Sena are locked in a bitter tussle over the chief minister’s post.

Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari on Saturday evening asked the BJP, the single largest party in the new Assembly, to “indicate the willingness and ability” to form government in the state.

In the October 21 polls to the 288-member Maharashtra Assembly, the BJP won 105 seats, Shiv Sena-56, NCP-54 and Congress-44.

Letters to the Editor: 10 November, 2019

letters to the editor, afternoon voice,Good money should never chase bad assets!

Rs 25000 crores energy booster to the realty sector from the Finance Minister is too little too late to a sector that is in the doldrums and a move to bail out politically backed builders who are bankrupt. Why should honest tax payers money be used to help the corrupt who have siphoned off many a banks money as corruption is the main cause why building projects could not have been completed. It should have been the other way round where unsold inventory of big infrastructure projects should have been taken possession by the government to repay banks many of whom have gone bust.

Good money should never chase bad assets and government is risking not just its own revenues but even those of LIC and SBI in helping the corrupt builders who have already looted the banks and investors.

S.N. Kabra

 

Government’s masterstroke to address home buyers woes

The government’s move to allocate Rs. 25,000 cr to stuck residential projects is a masterstroke to address home buyers issues relating to project deliveries and stressed developers funding issues that were stalling the completion of projects. Real estate sector which witnessed challenges in recent times will get major boost through this special window. This relief package will definitely ease the situation.  Also this move will benefit lakhs of homebuyers. It’s a big positive for developers and real estate sector.

Siddhartha Mohanty

 

Stalemate continues but waiting for the climax

The BJP and the Shiv Sena are locked in a tug-of-war over the issue of the chief minister’s post, resulting in a stalemate in government formation. Sena has claimed top leaders of the party and the BJP had agreed on sharing the chief minister’s post on a rotational basis and 50:50 distribution of portfolio ahead of the October 21 assembly polls in the state. The BJP has, however, denied any such arrangement with Uddhav Thackeray-led party and has insisted Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis will continue to hold the post for full term. Thus the stalemate continues and we are all waiting for the climax scene just like in a Bollywood film. There is no Box office status here but bookies are very busy predicting the outcome in favour BJP-Sena coalition.

Nikhil Mani

 

Don’t take law in hand

Nowadays Police personnel hold a candle light protest at Delhi Police Headquarters over alleged repeated incidents of violence against them by lawyers. Thus it is called that lawyers and police are expected to work in harmony, being two important pillars of the justice system. The ugly showdown between the two in the national capital of Delhi has exposed them to public ridicule and scorn, and more worryingly a loss of faith in these institutions. People are anxious that what is happening in the country’s capital and how can India develop when  law enforcement agencies are on the streets, what will happen to the common man? Hence law abiding and law enforcement should not be law breaker.

ATarique

 

Welcome Supreme Court verdict on Ram-Janmabhoomi

Chief Justice of India CJI should be complimented for taking all necessary precautions before pronouncing much-awaited and sensitive verdict on Ram-Janmabhoomi when in an unprecedented manner, CJI held a meeting in his chamber with concerned senior officers of UP responsible for ensuring law and order in the state. Furthermore, verdict was delivered on Saturday rather than normal working day between Monday and Friday, thus ensuring that weekend may provide a cool-down period before coming Monday.

Now that five-member Supreme Court has through its well-analysed unanimous decision on the most sensitive issue paving way for construction of a grand temple at Ram Janmabhoomi in Ayodhya under a government-managed trust. Indian Muslim community should respect religious sentiments of Hindus by extending support for construction of the temple at birth-place of Lord Ram at Ayodhya. Even though apex court declined Shia-community to be a party in the case, yet their suggestion for alternate land of five-acres for construction of a grand mosque at alternate place in Ayodhya was accepted by the court.

It will be even more welcome gesture if offer comes for sue-motto shifting mosques from Vishwanath Temple in Kashi and Krishna-Janmabhoomi in Mathura. Any such gesture will make India a glorious example of communal harmony. Grand mosques then can be made with co-operation of government and Hindu-organizations elsewhere at Kashi and Mathura also.

Subhash Chandra Agrawal


(The views expressed by the author in the article are his/her own.)

Help Parallel Media, Support Journalism, Free Press, Afternoon Voice

SC verdict on Ayodhya should not be seen as anybody’s win or loss: PM Narendra Modi

Narendra Modi, PM Narendra Modi, Ayodhya Land, Ayodhya Verdict, Supreme Court, SC, Babri Masjid

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday said the Supreme Court verdict on the Ayodhya land dispute should not be seen as anybody’s win or loss, and appealed to countrymen for peace, unity and amity.

In an unanimous verdict, the top court cleared the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site at Ayodhya, and directed the Centre to allot a 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.

“Whether it is devotion to Ram or Rahim, now is time for everybody to strengthen devotion to India,” the prime minister said in a series of tweets in reaction to the verdict.

He also asserted that the SC verdict in Ayodhya case will strengthen people’s faith in judicial system.

The temple of justice (the apex court) has resolved decades old dispute amicably, Modi said.

Not satisfied with Ayodhya verdict, will decide future course of action, says Zafaryab Jilani

Zafaryab Jilani, Ayodhya Case, Ayodhya Verdict, Supreme Court, Ram Mandir, Babri Masjid

Following the Supreme Court verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute, Sunni Waqf Board lawyer Zafaryab Jilani, expressed disappointment and said they would decide the future course of action.

“We respect the judgment but we are not satisfied, we will decide further course of action,” Jilani told reporters.

“But we also appeal to the nation to observe calm and maintain peace,” he added.

The Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi ordered that the central government within 3-4 months should formulate a scheme for setting up a trust and hand over the disputed site to it for construction of a temple at the site.

It also added that an alternative five acres of land at a prominent location in Ayodhya should be allotted for the construction of the mosque following consultation between the center and state government.

#AyodhyaVerdict: Temple to be build at disputed site, alternative 5-acre land for building mosque, says Supreme Court

Ayodhya Verdict, Supreme Court, Sunni Waqft Board, Sunni, Masjid, Mosque, Babri Masjid, Ayodhya Case, Supreme Court on Ayodhya, Ram Temple, Ram Mandir, BJPThe Supreme Court on Saturday cleared the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site at Ayodhya, and directed the Centre to allot a 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.

In one of the most important and most anticipated judgements in India’s history, a 5-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi put an end to the more than a century old dispute that has torn the social fabric of the nation.

The apex court said the mosque should be constructed at a “prominent site” and a trust should be formed within three months for the construction of the temple at the site many Hindus believe Lord Ram was born.

The site was occupied by the 16th century Babri mosque which was destroyed by Hindu kar sevaks on December 6, 1992.

The bench, also comprising Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer, said possession of the disputed 2.77 acre land rights will handed over to the deity Ram Lalla, who is one of the three litigants in the case. The possession however will remain with a central government receiver.

The Supreme Court said the Hindus have established their case that they were in possession of outer courtyard and the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board has failed to establish its case in the Ayodhya dispute.

Delivering its verdict in the politically-sensitive case of Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya, the apex court directed allotment of alternative land to Muslims to build a new mosque.

The apex court said the extensive nature of Hindus worshipping at outer courtyard at the disputed site has been there, and the evidence suggests the Muslims offered Friday prayers at mosque which indicates that they had not lost possession of the site.

It said that despite obstruction caused in offering prayers at Mosque, the evidences suggest that there was no abandonment in offering prayers.

The apex court further said said that the underlying structure below the disputed site at Ayodhya was not an Islamic structure, but the ASI has not established whether a temple was demolished to build a mosque.

It said that terming the archeological evidence as merely an opinion would be a great disservice to the Archaeological Survey of India.

The court also said that the Hindus consider the disputed site as the birthplace of Lord Ram and even Muslims say this about that place.

The faith of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the demolished structure is undisputed, the apex court said.

The bench said the existence of Sita Rasoi, Ram Chabutra and Bhandar grih are the testimony of the religious fact of the place.

The apex court said however that the title cannot be established on the ground of faith and belief and they are only indicators for deciding the dispute.

Devendra resigns – Maharashtra is likely to come under President’s rule

With the term of the state assembly ending on Saturday, Devendra Fadnavis resigns as Maharashtra Chief Minister with no sign of a new government and his BJP and its ally Shiv Sena no closer to forming one together. Fadnavis met Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari to hand his resignation hours before the midnight deadline for government formation. Maharashtra is likely to come under President’s rule with the term of the state assembly ending on Saturday. It is distressing for him and his party that the BJP is not forming the Government in Maharashtra. If two partners do not trust each other, it would have been better if they resolved to govern in 12 hours shift on daily basis and with rotation of shift on next day.Why ask for 2.5 years tenure for each?

The BJP and Shiv Sena failed to resolve a feud that began hours after they won a clear majority in last month’s Maharashtra election. On October 24, the day of the results, Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray sought to remind the BJP of a “50:50” power-sharing arrangement including chief ministership for the Sena for two-and-a-half years of the five-year term. Devendra Fadnavis was hoping for his second full term, rejected such a deal, but the BJP offered deputy chief ministership and key ministries, something that failed to mollify its long-term ally. Over the past 15 days, the row became more and more acrimonious with the Sena shooting a barb a day at the BJP, challenging it to stake claim to power as the single largest party and prove its majority on the floor of the house. The BJP won 105 seats in the 288-member house and along with the Sena’s 56, had 161 – enough and more to take power. But the Sena refused to play along, taking the fight to the brink while the BJP waited.

Devendra was not excellent CM but he was not that non-performer too, he has internal disputes with several leaders. Though the critics and political opponents approve that the Fadnavis is a soft-spoken, grounded and humble person. It is his charm that wins trust and respect of his supporters. Add to that, given his RSS background, Fadnavis is extremely disciplined. He knows how much to speak and when to speak. More importantly, he knows when to keep quiet. But the big test for him is now.

Fadnavis was selected as CM, because he was not a political heavyweight and without muscle to promote himself. Modi and Shah are always very tricky and calculative. They could have made Nitin Gatkari, late Gopinath Munde, or some other political strongman to lead Maharashtra, but they chose an obedient, pliant Fadnavis for the job. Fadnavis might have acted as Yogi or Sonowal and made daily headlines laughable but he is smart and waiting for his time. Modi is a template, moving from CM to PM, that good governance is a precious quality to fast forward, not only in business but politics also. When all other BJP ruled states were following strong actions on beef ban, against minorities, he followed a middle path without any untoward incidents. In Maharashtra there were less crimes against minorities and women. He maintained law and order at a reasonable level unlike UP or Haryana.

But when it comes to corruption, his government always came in controversy from Chikki scam by Pankaja Munde to more than 184 financial defaulters like Nirav Modi. The fraud amount in different cases under Devendra Fadnavis-led BJP government in the state, amounts to at least Rs 19,000 crore.

Mumbai-based RTI Activist Jeetendra Ghadge obtained this information from the Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of Mumbai Police.

The opposition accused Revenue Minister Chandrakant Patil of wrong doing.

Fadnavis-led urban development department released vast tracts of land, meant for construction of social and affordable housing of the poorer sections, for the benefit of some of the country’s top business families and a clutch of builders.

In a controversial move taken ahead of the Lok Sabha elections, the state Cabinet had approved the department’s proposal to lift curbs imposed on the development of vacant lands exempted under the erstwhile Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. “It is a Rs 20000-crore fraud. Land meant for the housing of the poor has been parceled out to the rich. Aarey car shed scam made very loud voice against him. There were many attacks and accusations by opposition, including he lied in affidavit. Corruption is not always monetary but using his position to benefit his near ones, a clear case in his wife’s movie and singing career too is kind of corruption. She got opportunity in lot of shows and singing acting videos, even against Big B. For her shows Maharashtra police was forced to sale tickets.

There are plus and minus in his 5 years rule, BJP won all grass-root level elections be the Panchayat Samiti, Municipal Corporation on the back of Fadnavis’s image. He is a gifted orator, intelligent as well as a strong fighter.

It is not often in Indian politics that a young man of just 22 manages to take up a political position; he was the youngest Mayor of Nagpur at the age of 27 years. In fact, he was the second youngest mayor in Indian politics, as he became the mayor of Nagpur back then. The outstanding performance combined with consistent political track record stood in good stead, as he became the Chief Minister of Maharashtra. He is among the youngest Chief Ministers in India. Maharashtra has been a different political ball game. It has always been the same with the Chief Ministership being an impossible thing to retain. He successfully completed his one tenure, let’s wait for the next.


(Any suggestions, comments or dispute with regards to this article send us on feedback@www.afternoonvoice.com)

Help Parallel Media, Support Journalism, Free Press, Afternoon Voice

MLAs Caged – Parties refrain from getting auctioned in power bargain

Tug of War between Sena and BJP, Shiv Sena, BJP, Sanjay Raut, Uddhav thackeray, Aaditya thackeray,devendra fadnavis, chandrakant patil,sudhir Mungantiwar ,maharashtra politics, mahgarashtrapoliticalcrisisTug of war continues in Maharashtra politics, as Shiv Sena demands Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to clarify his stand on the 50:50 deal and call Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray with some feasible terms. The deadline for government formation is midnight on Friday and 15 days after the Maharashtra election results were declared on October 24, the BJP-Sena feud remains unresolved. Shiv Sena has refused to back down on its demand for a “50:50” partnership with the BJP, including rotational chief ministership and has moved its MLAs to a hotel in Mumbai in an apparent attempt to prevent defections to the BJP. At the same time, Congress moved its MLAs to Jaipur. All the political parties have already caged their MLAs to prevent them from getting auctioned in power bargain.

When Afternoon Voice contacted NCP leader and Advocate Majeed Memon he said, “The BJP is desperately trying to remain in power by immoral and moral method. There are allegations from two Congress MLA stating that bribe offers are coming. This is a serious matter and should be reported to the Election Commission and Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB). The BJP headquarters from Maharashtra is also saying that they are prepared to give more plum portfolios to Shiv Sena. And this is literally auctioning of the cabinet ministries which should be condemned.”

When asked him, are they worried about BJP poaching their MLAs for forming the government he replied, “BJP’s poaching attempts are going on and they are expert in horse trading. But in Maharashtra they will be not able to do that because Sharad Pawar has already made a public statement two days ago that the skill of Amit Shah is on test in the state and they will not allow him to indulge in horse trading.”

Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut said BJP should prove its majority and stake claim. “They should get not just 15 days, but one month to prove their majority in the assembly, the single largest party should get the opportunity to form government first. If the Governor calls the single largest party to form government and their Chief Minister takes oath, then they have to show their majority on the floor of the house. If they fail, then others can form government. The Sena can too. But it is only fair that the largest party should get the chance first.”

NCP leader Vidya Chavan said, “A Congress MLA has said that BJP had made a proposal of paying Rs 50 crore to a Shiv Sena MLA. BJP is known for horse trading activities and look at the situation in Goa and Karnataka. Reddy brothers in Karnataka are involved in horse trading activities. Since both Congress and Shiv Sena are not willing to support BJP so they will use the same tactics to woo MLAs from other parties.”

Amid instability, right wing Hindu leader Sambhaji Bhide visited ‘Matoshree‘, the residence of Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray in suburban Bandra, on late Thursday evening. However, Thackeray was not at home and therefore Bhide, whose arrival was unpredicted, could not meet him, said a close aide of the Sena chief. But some media reports said Uddhav returned Bhide without meeting, to which Bhide’s close aide slammed such reports. Bhide’s surprise visit to Matoshree came amid the ongoing stand-off between the Sena and BJP, the two saffron allies, over chief minister’s post after the Maharashtra assembly polls. With a virtual communication breakdown between the alliance partners, Sambhaji Bhide volunteered to Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray’s residence Matoshree to conduct a fresh round of negotiations.

Maharashtra BJP chief Chandrakant Patil told AV, “The meeting with Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari was to discuss the legal implications of the delay in government formation. The BJP-Sena alliance has won a clear majority and based on that, a government should have been formed. We discussed with the Governor the implications and legal options in the circumstances.”

But the BJP has also not budged from its stand that Devendra Fadnavis will be Chief Minister for a full term, with no time-share with the Shiv Sena.

They tried to finish us with ‘sweet talks’: Uddhav slams BJP

Uddhav Thackeray slams BJP, uddhav thackeray, aaditya thackeray, devendra fadnavis, shiv sena, bjp, maharashtra political crisis
Image Courtesy: HT Media

After Devendra Fadnavis resigned as chief minister of Maharshtra on Friday, Shiv Sena Chief Uddhav Thackeray addressed a press conference for media on the false allegation made by Fadnavis against Sena.

Thackeray slammed ally BJP for trying ‘to prove him a liar’, claiming that it had agreed to share the chief minister’s post in Maharashtra during his talks with Amit Shah.

On Fadnavis allegation Thackeray said, “I am not a BJP wala. I do not lie. They had promised us and are now going back on their words.” Thackeray also alleged that the BJP tried to finish us with “sweet talk”.

Thackeray says he was hurt that the BJP tried to portray him as a liar.

He said, he would fulfill the promise made to his father, late Sena founder Bal Thackeray, to install a Shiv Sena chief minister in the state, and does not need Devendra Fadnavis or Shah for this.

He did not hold talks with the BJP after the Assembly poll results came in on October 24 as he could not tolerate being called a liar, he added.

The Sena chief also denied Fadnavis’s claim that Sena leaders targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi. According to Thackeray , he did not attack Modi but criticised the NDA government from time to time over policies.

The BJP and Sena are locked in a tussle over the chief minister’s post, resulting in a stalemate despite the poll results giving the saffron alliance a combined seat strength of 161, way past the 145 majority mark in the 288- member House.

A taste of mythology with a teaspoon of fiction

Heroes of Wars,Virat Vilas PawarYoung law student and BMM graduate Virat Vilas Pawar has authored a book titled “Heroes of War”. He believes that he is science fiction buff since childhood, writing is his passion and he authored his yearnings into words. Heroes of Wars- Men From The Future was born is a fiction and mixture of Mythology and science, a story that is inspired by Mahabharat. The books talks about how God from the past travels to the future to ask for a favour from its own final incarnation. He was in conversation with our Editor-in-chief Dr Vaidehi Taman, and says it is the era where one can afford to be brave and speak about the unspoken. Following are the excerpts from Tete-a-tete.

Have you heard of “Hero of War” song by Rise Against from the album Appeal to Reason?

Yes, I have.

Well! What has inspired you to write this book?

I have grown up watching a lot of cartoons and reading tons of comics, but I always felt there was something that was missing. Not from the creator’s perspective but from the receiver’s perspective. Later, I realised it was the “Desi Flavor” that was missing. We wouldn’t relate much to underground metros or yellow taxies, but we can relate to railway stations and BEST buses. As I grew up, I always wanted to create Indian Superheroes and give the Indian audience an authentic taste of Science Fiction. Now to connect with the Indian audience, what can be better than the rich mythology we have? When we say mythology, the first thing that comes to our mind is the deadliest war ever fought in the history of mankind. “Mahabharata,” we all know about Mahabharata; every character can be pulled out and turned into a superhero arch. So I think the need for science fiction and the richness of our mythology has inspired me to write Heroes of Wars: Men From The Future.

How much you read Mahabharata and understood the same?

I have spent more than a year just reading about Mahabharata and various theories about the epic. As per my knowledge, it is not possible for anybody to completely understand this epic. The deeper you dig, the deeper it goes. It has every single emotion, mood, and situation in it.

Do you believe that the God has past, future and present? If yes, how would you see the same God in present scenario where internal and external enemies surround India?

Well, I will answer this question as a fiction buff. God, as a supreme entity, he knows the past; he is aware of the present and also knows the future. I feel it’s all pre-written, everything wrong that is happening now is part of a big plan (happy ending) where we all are just puppets, playing our roles to make it happen. So yes, maybe the good, the bad, the ugly is all part of God’s plan.

How do you define Adharma? And what is a War against Adharma?

I am quoting dialogue from my novel –

“Dharma doesn’t have to only mean religion or praying to one God.

The real meaning of Dharma is reality, faith, and belief in

Something; Dharma is doing what you have to do; Dharma

Is believing in the good; Dharma is supporting the right.”

This is Dharma, according to me. Adharma can be exactly opposite of it- being unfair, killing in the name of a specific thing, being dishonest, betraying people, not following humanity, and doing something wrong when you know it is not the right action.  A War against Adharma means a fight that is against everything wrong for the greater good.

Why is Mahabharata a war against Adharma even if it was won by unfair methods?

Even though Lord Krishna used unfair means to help the Pandavas win the war, the intentions and the ultimate goal was to defeat the big bad villain. It doesn’t matter what methods you use as long as you are on the right side.

Kurukshetra is a family dispute, war happened between the cousins, Kauravas and Pandavas for the Kingdom but Mahabharatha is not a war it’s an epic. What is your take on this?

Of course, Mahabharata is an epic that involves thousands of characters with subplots of their own. The war could have been avoided, but the stubbornness lead to the devastation, isn’t it like today? There is a quarrel in the family that leads to the massive division of things. Every war/fight that takes place happens between two parties and later involves their allies, leading to the expansion of the teams.

What would have happened if the Kauravas had won the war against the Pandavas?

The victorious people tell the stories of victories. Maybe Kauravas would have told a story about how they won despite so much politics. Given the nature of the Kauravas ( As per the existing knowledge), maybe the world would be a different place now. (Psh, there is a part in the novel where you would get to know how the world would be if Kauravas won)

If Karna was killed by unethical means, how did Mahabharata Yuddham (Mahabharata War) become “Dharma Yuddham” (Righteous War)?

Even while I think of Karna, I get goosebumps. A warrior so perfect but unlucky in all the possible phases of life but it doesn’t matter how you are, what matters is what side you choose. If you stand on the side of evil, you are evil too. Karna knew Kauravas were wrong, but he still decided to fight on their side because he wanted to take revenge from Pandavas for being mistreated.

When you are talking about future, why didn’t Krishna actively participate in the Mahabharata war in the past?

*SPOILER ALERT!* Lord Krishna did participate, but due to some reasons, he couldn’t win the war, after numerous alternatives he finally decides to go to the future and recruit five super-warriors and fight Pandavas in this alternate timeline.

In the Mahabharata, why didn’t Sri Krishna save Abhimanyu when he knew already that he was about to be killed?

Action leads to reaction; Lord Krishna knew everything; he knew what would trigger Arjun the most. Maybe, he wanted to save the card for some other day and use it at the right time. We can’t comment on the action of a supreme entity.

Krishna was the most skilled at war strategy; but who tipped the scales when it came to might, Bheeshma, Arjuna, Karna or someone else, who was the most powerful warrior in the Mahabharata?

All of them were stronger than we can comprehend but if I had to name a few, the list would start from Karna, who was the master of all. Then comes Bheeshma, who taught both Kauravas and Pandavas. Of course, Lord Krishna has to be on the list considering who he was. Arjun is usually regarded as the strongest of all, but he broke down several times during the war, thanks to Lord Krishna’s guidance he managed everything pretty well.

In today’s time you do completely agree with the saga of Pandavas and Kaurava’s birth? How do you look at Panchali?

We believe what we are told. The birth of both Pandavas and Kauravas is unbelievable. In a world where we desperately need demigods and men with superpowers to step in, and we see none, it’s hard to believe something like this, but from a fiction perspective, “WOW.” Panchali was born out of the fire, the fire of rage. There are two ways of looking at her. Either strong woman or woman who didn’t take proper stand. Well, she managed five demigods on her own (initially), so I consider her quite strong.

Well, what is your objective of writing this book and what s your message to our readers?

The main objective of writing Heroes of Wars is to give the audience a taste of mythology with a teaspoon of fiction. As I said, we have a rich mythology, and I had to make use of the references to make something big. I wanted to give my readers something we already know dressed in a completely different way.

The message that I want to give the readers is to believe in you. Everything is possible in this world; with the right planning, everything can be conquered regardless of how difficult it seems.