Home Blog Page 5356

Police are worst thanTaliban

PoonamPandeyModel turned actress Poonam Pandey is miffed with the Mumbai Police for detaining her for indecent behavior in public place.Poonam compared the Police with Taliban and blamed the administration for questioning her. The actress was detained by Mira road Police station on Saturday Night for indecent behavior in public and was left after a warning.

Talking to AV, Poonam said, “I was not misbehaving in publice and was simply seated in the car with my brother.They had detained me at 1030 pm at night which is unjustified.Its a kind of Talibanisation of the Mumbai Police in the hands of local administration.If I can be pulled up for going on a drive with my brother, I shudder to think what would happen to any girl who goes out there with her boyfriend.”

In her defence Poonam laimed that she was not under the influence of alcohol when police was questioning her. She didn’t indulge in any act which would have created any distraction in the area.

MsPandey also added that she might have been targeted as she hails from Uttar Pradesh and her surname is Pandey.
“Initially, when cops were talking to me, they were very lenient to us.When they learnt that I am Poonam Pandey they started behaving rudely with me after hearing my surname as a Pandey. What is my fault if I am a Pandey? Cops also were trying to gain some mileage by targeting me.” Poonam added further.

Poonam said that cops were saying that she was skimpily dressed.I would like to clarifty that I was dressed appropriatelyand even girls wear shorts and tops to the campus which is more revealing.

Dhanaji Kshirsagar, Senior Police Inspector from Mira Road Police Station has claimed that the allegation made by PoonamPandey is baseless.He also added that the police was only doing their job.

Talking to AV, Dhanaji Kshirsagar said, “She is making irresponsible statement. We have detained Poonam forin decent behavior in public place. A witness has seen the model behaving indecentlyin public. The allegation which she made against the police that it treated her harshly is unjustified. When we took Poonam home then her mother thanked us to bring her back home.”

Powell, Tata meet CM Chavan

Nancy-PowellUS Ambassador to India Nancy Powell lauded the strides made by Maharashtra on the industrial development front in the last few years.

Powell, the outgoing US envoy, met chief minister Prithviraj Chavan and discussed issues like the ongoing Lok Sabha polls, post-poll ties between India and the US and economy, an official said, after the meeting.

Powell appreciated the cooperation extended by the state government to the various initiatives of the US consulate.

The chief minister dwelt on the need for the US universities to open campus for Indian students so that they get to learn global-level curriculum.

Powell also wanted to know about the Delhi-Mumbai industrial corridor. Chavan informed the envoy that besides Pune and Mumbai, industrial development was taking place in urban centres like Nagpur, Nashik and Aurangabad.

Meanwhile, Tata Group Chairman Emeritus Ratan Tata also met Chavan and expressed the desire to be part of the initiatives of the state government in education, employment and health sectors, as part of corporate social responsibility.

Three arrested for murder in Thane

With the arrest of three persons, Thane rural police claimed to have cracked a murder case.

Senior Police Inspector Kishore Khairnar said that on April 3, body of a middle-aged man was found on Nandni-Koshim road near the Bombil Pada junction. The body had been dumped into a culvert.

The man, identified as Barku Rama Samosa (40), a resident of Naik Wadi, Valiv, had been strangulated.

Police found out that he had had a dispute with Umesh Damaji Gangan (34) of Vasai. Gangan had built chawls on the land belonging to Samosa’s father-in-law.

The dispute was related to the chawls, police said.

According to police, Gangan and other accused invited him to visit a land and murdered him at an isolated place.

The other two accused were identified as SurajShamraoJadhav (23) and RafiqueSayya Patel (26).

Yukta, husband seek quashing of cases against each other

After arriving at an amicable settlement in their matrimonial dispute, former Miss World Yukta Mookhey and her estranged husband Prince Tuli have approached the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the cases filed against each other in various courts.
Yukta-husbandOn July 3, 2013, Mookhey filed a case against her husband, parents-in-law and sisters-in-law under sections 498A (cruelty) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the IPC. She had accused Tuli under IPC section 377 (unnatural sex) also.

She had also filed a private compliant with magistrate alleging cruelty by Tuli.

While Tuli’s family members were granted anticipatory bail by a lower court, his plea was rejected following which he approached the High Court seeking anticipatory bail.

The High Court had then suggested the couple to go for mediation and attempt to resolve their disputes.
Last month, the couple informed the court that they reached an amicable settlement following which Tuli was granted anticipatory bail.

Filji Fredrick and TaubanIrani, counsels for Tuli and Mookhey respectively, had informed the court then that the settlement conditions had been finalised and the duo mutually decided to withdraw cases filed against each other in various courts.

Tuli and his family members have now filed a petition in the High Court seeking quashing of the cases registered against them. Mookhey, who is a co-petitioner, has agreed to give ‘No Objection’ for quashing of the cases.
The petition today came up for hearing before a division bench of Justices N H Patil and AnujaPrabhudessai which has posted it for hearing beyond summer vacations.

Tuli had in May last year approached the family court in Nagpur seeking divorce. It has been agreed between the parties that the couple will file fresh application seeking divorce by mutual consent before the family court in Mumbai.

Mookhey married Tuli in 2008. Prince’s family has a transport and hospitality business in Nagpur. She has been staying with her parents and four-year-old son since 2012.

Witness claims he is receiving death threats in Salman hit-and-run case

After Bollywood superstar Salman Khan reached the Mumbai sessions court, two witnesses identified him so far in relation to his 2002 hit-and-run case. The retrial of the infamous case began last week with witnesses deposing before the magistrate. The actor was seen accompanied by his sisters while entering the court. If found guilty, the actor could face jail term upto ten years.
Two of the witnesses deposed before the court in order to testify and identify whether Salman was present on the spot of the accident or not. Reportedly, the 48-year-old actor was seen by these two witnesses getting out from his car on that fateful day.

According to reports, one of the witnesses who deposed today has lodged a complaint claiming that he has received a threatening call a few days back. Reportedly, the court will take this matter in the next hearing itself.

During the deposing process last week, a witness named Samba Gowda, said he had drawn panchnama of the articles seized by police on the day of the incident on September 28, 2002.

The witness told prosecutor Jagannath Kenjalkar that it was a big car involved in the accident and said police had reached the spot along with him. He further said the car had rammed into a laundry and its bumper had hit the shutter of the shop. The witness said he saw glass pieces, number plate of the car and bumper parts lying on the spot. These articles were seized by police and a panchnama was drawn by him.

On March 26, three witnesses failed to turn up as they were either not available or untraceable making this the second occasion when the fresh trial has not begun in the case.

The Bollywood superstar is facing the charges of running over his Toyota Land Cruiser on people sleeping on a footpath outside a bakery in suburban Bandra on September 28, 2002, killing one and injuring four others.

Congress wants Pawar to take ‘firm’ action against defiant leaders

With a view to instill a sense of trust and strengthen coordination between two alliance partners ahead of crucial Maharashtra Assembly elections, the Congress asked NCP leadership to take “definite” action against party leaders who tried to spoil the prospects of nominees put up by Congress in just-held Lok Sabha polls.

While citing the action taken by its coalition partner against those leaders who had defied the party line to work against official candidates, Congress said it would also “reciprocate”.

NCP has taken action against Vijaykumar Gavit by sacking him from the ministry and the party after his daughter bagged the BJP candidature in Nandurbar against Congress veteran Manikrao Gavit.

“Similarly, Sawantwadi MLA Deepak Kesarkar resigned after he refused to tow the NCP line to support Congress candidate Nitesh Rane in Ratnagiri-Sindhudurg. Similarly, Sindhudurg district NCP chief Bal Bhise was sacked,” Thakre said.

He said the action against such leaders should be followed up with not giving them tickets for the Assembly polls and not taking them back in the party.

Thakre said that barring a few places, the overall coordination between Congress and NCP was “good” as “both the parties fought elections together and in true spirit of the coalition”.

“We expect some definite action from Sharad Pawar in this respect at the NCP’s May 10 meeting in Mumbai. Congress will also do the same,” he said.

Citing example of Parbhani Lok Sabha seat, Thakare said the NCP candidate Vijay Bhambale had contested as an Independent against Congress MLA Ramprasad Bordikar in 2009 elections.

“Bhamble was reinstated within 15 days in the NCP and was made the district unit chief of the party and also given the NCP candidature for Lok Sabha polls,” he added.

Three-Month-Old ‘Miracle Baby’ Survives Raigad Train Mishap

Surekha Nakte — a passenger on the ill-fated Diva – Sawantwadi train — was crushed to death instantly when the compartment she was traveling in was derailed on Sunday morning in Maharashtra’s Raigad district.

But Manasvi, her three-month-old daughter who was tucked in Surekha’s arms, miraculously survived the mishap.

Rescue workers found her under a seat of the mangled compartment.

22 people lost their lives when four compartments and the engine of the Diva- Sawantwadi Passenger train derailed between Roha and Nagothane station.

Manasvi has been admitted to a private hospital and is recovering well.

“When the child was bought here she was in a very critical stage. She was unconscious, totally dehydrated and not responding. We started intensive treatment and within a few hours, she regained consciousness. By evening, she had started taking feeds,” said Dr Minal Wagle, her attending physician.

Dr. Wagle added, “She has lost her mother in this accident. Her father is also in a critical condition. Her two sisters have been admitted to a hospital in Mumbai”.

Manasvi’s family was on its way to attend a wedding in Mangaon in the Konkan region.

At Sion hospital in Mumbai, Manasvi’s older sister Jahnvi is asking for her parents.

“She is asking about her younger sister and her parents. She wants to know where they are. I have no answer to these questions,” said Jahnvi’s uncle Pandurang Kamble.

Union Railway Minister Mallikarjun Kharge, who visited the site on Monday, admitted that the reason behind the derailment still had to be ascertained.

“We are doing our best. The tracks are maintained by human beings and trains are run by human beings. Sometimes such incidents happen; we are learning our lessons from that,” he said.

According to sources, a crack on the railway tracks is suspected to have led to the derailment.

A railway official on a routine inspection was on his way to inspect the area and was just 10 minutes away when the accident took place, they claimed.

Ordering an enquiry and promising compensation is the standard reaction of the Indian Railways after every such accident.

But do these measures mean anything for those, like Manasvi, whose lives are altered irreparably after such accidents?

Thrashed by son, 70-year-old man dies

A senior citizen was allegedly thrashed to death by his 32-year-old son following a heated argument at the latter’s residence in neighbouring Thane district, police said.

Victim Dattaram Salaskar (70) was beaten by his son Shailesh on the intervening night of Sunday and Monday, police said.

The injured, who was later admitted in a government run Cooper hospital here for injuries, died yesterday while undergoing treatment, following which a murder case was registered against Shailesh at Andheri police station in the city, police said.

According to police, Salaksar had rung up his brother-in-law Vishnu Parab (71), a resident of suburban Andheri, at 3.30 am on Monday claiming that his son had beaten him up very badly. “Rattled Salaskar told Parab that he would be coming to latter’s residence in Andheri,” police said.

“Salaskar took a cab from Thane but fainted while travelling. The cab driver subsequently alerted the police patrolling team, which rushed him to a nearby Cooper hospital,” police said.

The victim died yesterday afternoon while undergoing treatment; police said adding that an FIR was registered against Shailesh at Andheri police station.

The reason for the argument between the father-son duo which led to the murder was not yet clear. The case has been transferred to the police station concerned in Thane for further investigation as the incident occurred there, police said.

Building collapse case: HC grants bail to four TMC employees

Four employees of Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC), who had been arrested in connection with a building collapse incident at Daighar area in Shil Phata near Thane, were granted bail by the Bombay Hight Court.

The four accused had been arrested around a year ago.

The TMC employees who were granted bail are- Deputy Municipal Commissioner Deepak Chavan, Assistant Municipal Commissioner Babasaheb Andale, engineer Ramesh Inamdar and clerk Kisan Madke.

With this, the total number of persons released on bail so far in this case has gone up to eleven. While the police had arrested 24 accused, three are still at large.

Special public prosecutor Shishir Hirey told that the state would challenge the order in the Supreme Court.

The eight-storey building had collapsed in Mumbra, a suburb of Thane, on April 4, 2013 in which 74 people, including 18 children, had died.

Why ‘Snoopgate’ probing now?

A father of a woman who was allegedly stalked in Narendra Modi’s Gujarat, in the scandal dubbed ‘Snoopgate’, has moved the Supreme Court against any investigation, saying it would violate the privacy of his daughter, who is now married. Each politician boasts about woman’s security and dignity in this country but when it comes to political motive, they don’t mind to tear apart her existence. Why this ‘Snoopgate’ has become important issue when the victim herself is denying the probe as she is already married and having kids? With such news and probe, we are weakening the family and making their life bizarre. The political noise over Snoopgate has allowed attention to divert from the serious questions that the scandal raised, and which remains unanswered.

The Central Government has put its image in soil. If the two allies of the UPA were against the probe and the delay then they should have avoided the probe by the judge. Both the Union Law Minister and the Home Minister were trumpeting about the appointment of a Judge. If they had the powers then they would have not only appointed the Judge earlier but also published the report and tarnished the image of the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate. The Congress Party and its alliance partners require a peaceful retreat to think and act. Let the answer come from the soul who has a heart. This comes on a day when union minister Kapil Sibal confirmed that the government had stopped looking for a judge to head an inquiry into whether Narendra Modi had ordered excessive surveillance on the woman, an architect, in 2009.

Two key allies had strongly objected when the government announced last week that it would appoint a judge for the “Snoopgate” probe before votes for the national election are counted on May 16. One of them, Sharad Pawar, called Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the other, Omar Abdullah, tweeted “Was talking to my dad last night & he felt the same way – setting up a commission of inquiry in the dying hours of UPA 2 is just wrong (sic).” The BJP has said the commission will not stand legal scrutiny and a new government would review it. The Snoopgate scandal erupted with the revelation of phone conversations secretly recorded in 2009 by GL Singhal, a former senior police officer in Gujarat. The tapes allegedly establish that a “saheb” or big boss in Gujarat sought information on the movements and phone calls of the woman architect. The Congress alleges that the “sahib” was Modi.

The BJP says the woman’s father, who was known to Modi, was worried about her safety and asked for her to be protected. Congress on Tuesday said the Government dropped its move to name a judge to head the commission set up to probe ‘Snoopgate’, as it did not want to give an impression of political vendetta to go around as suggested by the allies. A controversy had broken out last week when senior ministers including Sibal and Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde had told the media that a judge would be named into the surveillance. The announcement came under severe attack from the BJP, which slammed the UPA saying it was practising vendetta out of desperation of defeat in the elections. The party also questioned the need for such a probe when the state government itself had ordered a commission of inquiry into the same subject.

However, what apparently took the government by surprise was the opposition from its allies-NCP and National Conference-which questioned appointment of the judge in the “dying days” of UPA-II.

The current election campaign has seen a resurgence of the “Snoopgate” controversy. In an election which it is expected to lose abysmally, the Congress has used the scandal as ammunition against Narendra Modi, the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, who is accused of ordering the illegal surveillance of a young woman architect in Gujarat. The controversy has its genesis in the CBI’s probe into another possible abuse of state power by the Gujarat government: the alleged fake encounters that were carried out by Gujarat’s Anti-Terror Squad (ATS). Several top police officers are now in jail on charges that include murder, criminal conspiracy and wrongful confinement. BJP has accepted that the young woman was placed under surveillance, but emphasises it was done with her knowledge and for her own security at the behest of her father, who claimed an old association with Modi. The UPA’s clumsy last-ditch attempt to gain political capital from Snoopgate has only allowed the BJP to deflect attention from the core charges.